ACM-14807: Update go-jose to v2.6.3 to mitigate CVE-2024-28180

[paul-maidment]

Bumping go-jose to 2.6.4 to mitigate the CVE

List all the issues related to this PR

• New Feature
• Enhancement
• Bug fix
• Tests
• Documentation
• CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

• Automation (CI, tools, etc)
• Cloud
• Operator Managed Deployments
• None

How was this code tested?

• assisted-test-infra environment
• dev-scripts environment
• Reviewer's test appreciated
• Waiting for CI to do a full test run
• Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
• No tests needed

Checklist

• Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
• Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
• This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
• Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

• Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
• Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
• Should this PR be backported?

[openshift-ci-robot]

@paul-maidment: This pull request references ACM-14807 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Bumping go-jose to 2.6.4 to mitigate the CVE

List all the issues related to this PR

• New Feature
• Enhancement
• Bug fix
• Tests
• Documentation
• CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

• Automation (CI, tools, etc)
• Cloud
• Operator Managed Deployments
• None

How was this code tested?

• assisted-test-infra environment
• dev-scripts environment
• Reviewer's test appreciated
• Waiting for CI to do a full test run
• Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
• No tests needed

Checklist

• Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
• Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
• This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
• Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

• Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
• Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
• Should this PR be backported?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.30%. Comparing base (858cc66) to head (92b17da).
Report is 3 commits behind head on release-ocm-2.10.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-ocm-2.10    #6896   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage             68.30%   68.30%           
=================================================
  Files                   236      236           
  Lines                 35105    35133   +28     
=================================================
+ Hits                  23979    23999   +20     
- Misses                 9052     9056    +4     
- Partials               2074     2078    +4     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
pkg/auth/auth_handler_test_utils.go	77.77% <ø> (ø)

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adriengentil, paul-maidment

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [adriengentil]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment