Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Made hello-openshift read the message from an environment variable #10894

Merged

Conversation

knobunc
Copy link
Contributor

@knobunc knobunc commented Sep 13, 2016

This is a minor enhancement to the hello-openshift image to optionally
read the response string from the RESPONSE environment variable.

This is a minor enhancement to the hello-openshift image to optionally
read the response string from the RESPONSE environment variable.
@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor Author

knobunc commented Sep 13, 2016

@bparees PTAL

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 13, 2016

Lgtm

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

It's better to use the deployment images for some of this (if you need to add features beyond this).

@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor Author

knobunc commented Sep 14, 2016

@smarterclayton I just wanted a way to have multiple pods back a service and know which I am hitting. I've hit this a few times, so figured that it was not unreasonable to add.

1 similar comment
@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor Author

knobunc commented Sep 14, 2016

@smarterclayton I just wanted a way to have multiple pods back a service and know which I am hitting. I've hit this a few times, so figured that it was not unreasonable to add.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[Test]ing while waiting on the merge queue

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to 45b12df

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test FAILURE (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/8962/)

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 19, 2016

flake #10951
[merge]

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 19, 2016

flake #10951
flake #10987
[merge]

@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor Author

knobunc commented Sep 19, 2016

flake #10951
flake #10987
[merge] again

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 20, 2016

flake #9379
[merge]

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 20, 2016

flake #11006
flake #9379
[merge]

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 20, 2016

flake #10951
[merge]

@Kargakis @mfojtik these deployment flakes are really bad.

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented Sep 20, 2016

@bparees it really is a docker flake (deployer pod failed to start)

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 20, 2016

@mfojtik then why aren't we seeing it for build pods failing to start?

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 20, 2016

@mfojtik or application pods?

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 20, 2016

[merge]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:27 PM, OpenShift Bot notifications@github.com
wrote:

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge FAILURE (
https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/9027/)


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#10894 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEvl3lPdFo6clT7xyUwAm9Z7CQAcsfYwks5qr_tkgaJpZM4J8G-h
.

Ben Parees | OpenShift

@0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor

0xmichalis commented Sep 20, 2016

@mfojtik then why aren't we seeing it for build pods failing to start?

What timeouts do you use in extended tests for build pods? A quick look shows you use 2min. We have stricter timeouts for deployments.

#10951 uses a 20s timeout
#11008 is not using a timeout
#10989 is not using a timeout (although this looks fishy because we are already using a timeout for the deployment to complete but we aren't actually waiting?)

We should probably increase those timeouts but by now, I think it's obvious that there is no deployment failure involved, it's just the deployer pod pending. And there is nothing special about the deployer pod.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

[merge]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:12 PM, OpenShift Bot notifications@github.com
wrote:

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge FAILURE (
https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/9039/)


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#10894 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABG_p2xaFtLKxlLJRF4QWKf0Sb0NGFsTks5qsCIbgaJpZM4J8G-h
.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 20, 2016

[merge]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:22 PM, OpenShift Bot notifications@github.com
wrote:

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge FAILURE (
https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/9044/)


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#10894 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEvl3jzMmT4hI-mK8IV1mM6RH8_dO9_cks5qsECYgaJpZM4J8G-h
.

Ben Parees | OpenShift

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 21, 2016

flake #11016
[merge]

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 21, 2016

[merge]

1 similar comment
@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor Author

knobunc commented Sep 21, 2016

[merge]

@bparees bparees self-assigned this Sep 22, 2016
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Sep 22, 2016

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to 45b12df

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 22, 2016

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/9133/) (Image: devenv-rhel7_5058)

@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 41bd79e into openshift:master Sep 22, 2016
@knobunc knobunc deleted the feature/hello-openshift-message branch October 11, 2016 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants