-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-38010: [release-4.16]: Skip firmware reset on devices the operator doesn't control #980
OCPBUGS-38010: [release-4.16]: Skip firmware reset on devices the operator doesn't control #980
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sch <sebassch@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sch <sebassch@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sch <sebassch@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sch <sebassch@gmail.com>
This commit makes the functions to return error if we are not able to read from the configuration cache on the node. Also this commit fix a bug when checking if a MLX card is controlled by the operator Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sch <sebassch@gmail.com>
/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-36683 |
@zeeke: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36683 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38010. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@zeeke: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38010, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@zeeke: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/jira refresh |
@SchSeba: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38010, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (elevin@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: SchSeba, zeeke The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
48d1049
into
openshift:release-4.16
@zeeke: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38010: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38010 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: sriov-network-config-daemon |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: sriov-network-operator |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: sriov-network-webhook |
/cherry-pick release-4.15 |
/cherrypick release-4.15 |
@SchSeba: #980 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.15":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@SchSeba: #980 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.15":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
4.16 Backport of
no conflicts
This should fix the failing test
cc @SchSeba