Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BRT: Limit brt_vdev_dump() to only one vdev #15625

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2023

Conversation

amotin
Copy link
Member

@amotin amotin commented Dec 2, 2023

Without this patch on pool of 60 vdevs with ZFS_DEBUG enabled clone takes much more time than copy, while heavily trashing dbgmsg for no good reason, repeatedly dumping all vdevs BRTs again and again, even unmodified ones, for each cloned/freed block.

I am generally not sure this dumping is not excessive, but decided to keep it for now, just restricting its scope to more reasonable.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

Without this patch on pool of 60 vdevs with ZFS_DEBUG enabled clone
takes much more time than copy, while heavily trashing dbgmsg for
no good reason, repeatedly dumping all vdevs BRTs again and again,
even unmodified ones.

I am generally not sure this dumping is not excessive, but decided
to keep it for now, just restricting its scope to more reasonable.

Signed-off-by:	Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
@amotin amotin added the Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing label Dec 2, 2023
@rincebrain
Copy link
Contributor

rincebrain commented Dec 3, 2023

Maybe a new zfs_flags bit to gate BRT debug info being more verbose would be reasonable?

e: Nevermind, I see, you did do that, I only looked at the unconditional zfs_dbgmsg earlier.

Copy link
Contributor

@behlendorf behlendorf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We may also want to consider removing ZFS_DEBUG_BRT from the default debug zfs_flags.

@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Dec 5, 2023
@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 9743d09 into openzfs:master Dec 6, 2023
23 of 26 checks passed
@amotin amotin deleted the brt_vdev_dump branch December 6, 2023 23:52
lundman pushed a commit to openzfsonwindows/openzfs that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2023
Without this patch on pool of 60 vdevs with ZFS_DEBUG enabled clone
takes much more time than copy, while heavily trashing dbgmsg for
no good reason, repeatedly dumping all vdevs BRTs again and again,
even unmodified ones.

I am generally not sure this dumping is not excessive, but decided
to keep it for now, just restricting its scope to more reasonable.

Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes openzfs#15625
mmatuska pushed a commit to mmatuska/zfs that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2023
Without this patch on pool of 60 vdevs with ZFS_DEBUG enabled clone
takes much more time than copy, while heavily trashing dbgmsg for
no good reason, repeatedly dumping all vdevs BRTs again and again,
even unmodified ones.

I am generally not sure this dumping is not excessive, but decided
to keep it for now, just restricting its scope to more reasonable.

Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes openzfs#15625
mmatuska pushed a commit to mmatuska/zfs that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2023
Without this patch on pool of 60 vdevs with ZFS_DEBUG enabled clone
takes much more time than copy, while heavily trashing dbgmsg for
no good reason, repeatedly dumping all vdevs BRTs again and again,
even unmodified ones.

I am generally not sure this dumping is not excessive, but decided
to keep it for now, just restricting its scope to more reasonable.

Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes openzfs#15625
mmatuska pushed a commit to mmatuska/zfs that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2023
Without this patch on pool of 60 vdevs with ZFS_DEBUG enabled clone
takes much more time than copy, while heavily trashing dbgmsg for
no good reason, repeatedly dumping all vdevs BRTs again and again,
even unmodified ones.

I am generally not sure this dumping is not excessive, but decided
to keep it for now, just restricting its scope to more reasonable.

Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes openzfs#15625
behlendorf pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2024
Without this patch on pool of 60 vdevs with ZFS_DEBUG enabled clone
takes much more time than copy, while heavily trashing dbgmsg for
no good reason, repeatedly dumping all vdevs BRTs again and again,
even unmodified ones.

I am generally not sure this dumping is not excessive, but decided
to keep it for now, just restricting its scope to more reasonable.

Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes #15625
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants