Cgroup scripts #423
Open
Cgroup scripts #423
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Current implementation allows iterating only online csses. Add optional argument (not to break existing) callers to iterate also offlined nodes. This is as racy wrt cgroup removal/subsys disabling as the original code. Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Prepare for additional operations on cgroups. This rework breaks previously accepted order of arguments '<cgroup> bpf' and requires specifying the intended command. (No cgroups fall back to root cgrp.) Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Print information about cgroup_subsys_state counts associated with given cgroup. The main purpose is to show subsys structs in offline state on cgroup v2. Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is based on discussion around cgroup.stat and as an exercise with drgn, I'm sharing it in the case anyone found that useful.
There is also a little change outside of
contrib/.BTW How is that with drgn and RCU protected data? Is it simply neglected and one should be ready for transient issues when dereferencing gone data (that's actually not specific to RCU) when debugging a running system?