Minor StaticHTML reporter code improvements

[fviernau]

See individual commits.

[sschuberth]

Just wondering, is the static HTML reporter still be using (on your side)? I'm every now and then tempted to remove it.

[fviernau]

ust wondering, is the static HTML reporter still be using (on your side)? I'm every now and then tempted to remove it.

I'm still using it. I'll now incrementally make the mapper code more readable, as it is too hard for me to change it in the current state. Once done, I plan to do some improvements to the StaticHtml report.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (1e4a20c) 66.96% compared to head (b6bf04f) 66.96%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #7916   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     66.96%   66.96%           
  Complexity     2041     2041           
=========================================
  Files           356      356           
  Lines         17084    17084           
  Branches       2443     2443           
=========================================
  Hits          11440    11440           
  Misses         4623     4623           
  Partials       1021     1021           

Flag	Coverage Δ
funTest-docker	66.91% <ø> (ø)
funTest-non-docker	34.46% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sschuberth]

Once done, I plan to do some improvements to the StaticHtml report.

Generally, I'd be interested for what features you're still using it, and whether it makes more sense to migrate any missing feature to the web app reporter instead of adding more feature to the static HTML reporter. Maybe a good topic for the community meeting to get a feeling for which reasons, if at all, people are still using the static report.

[fviernau]

Generally, I'd be interested for what features you're still using it, and whether it makes more sense to migrate any missing feature to the web app reporter instead of adding more feature to the static HTML reporter. Maybe a good topic for the community meeting to get a feeling for which reasons, if at all, people are still using the static report.

I'd need to prepare for that, as I would need to actually do some clearance work and take notes of the things.
I can't promise to have time for that very soon-ish. Out of my head, searching, copy-pasting and deep-links I believe are better in the static HTML. Also re-generating it should be faster. Finding things I look for can be done without any clicking, expanding using the mouse.