Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Nod 690 nodo cfg sync microservizio #3

Merged
merged 94 commits into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

lorenzo-catalano
Copy link
Contributor

List of Changes

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@fparisitas fparisitas changed the title Nod 690 nodo cfg sync microservizio feat: Nod 690 nodo cfg sync microservizio Mar 1, 2024
@fparisitas fparisitas requested a review from aomegax March 4, 2024 17:07
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2024

This PR exceeds the recommended size of 400 lines. Please make sure you are NOT addressing multiple issues with one PR. Note this PR might be rejected due to its size.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2024

Comment this PR with update_code to format the code. Consider to use pre-commit to format the code.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 5, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
31.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

@fparisitas fparisitas merged commit c9c59b1 into main Mar 5, 2024
5 of 9 checks passed
@fparisitas fparisitas deleted the NOD-690-nodo-cfg-sync-microservizio branch March 5, 2024 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants