Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

expression: implement vectorized evaluation for builtinLowerStr #12013

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Sep 11, 2019
Merged

expression: implement vectorized evaluation for builtinLowerStr #12013

merged 11 commits into from
Sep 11, 2019

Conversation

qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

@qw4990 qw4990 commented Sep 3, 2019

What problem does this PR solve?

Implement vectorized evaluation for builtinLowerStr.

What is changed and how it works?

Almost 2x faster than before:

BenchmarkVectorizedBuiltinFunc/builtinLowerSig-VecBuiltinFunc-12                           30000             54573 ns/op
BenchmarkVectorizedBuiltinFunc/builtinLowerSig-NonVecBuiltinFunc-12                        10000            109605 ns/op

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #12013 into master will increase coverage by 0.0565%.
The diff coverage is 76.4705%.

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             master   #12013        +/-   ##
==============================================
+ Coverage   81.2734%   81.33%   +0.0565%     
==============================================
  Files           452      450         -2     
  Lines         96697    96583       -114     
==============================================
- Hits          78589    78551        -38     
+ Misses        12466    12398        -68     
+ Partials       5642     5634         -8

@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor Author

qw4990 commented Sep 3, 2019

/run-all-tests

@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor Author

qw4990 commented Sep 3, 2019

/run-unit-test

@qw4990 qw4990 mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2019
Merged
XuHuaiyu
XuHuaiyu reviewed Sep 4, 2019
View reviewed changes
expression/bench_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
expression/builtin_string_vec.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@SunRunAway SunRunAway removed their request for review September 4, 2019 08:57
@qw4990 qw4990 removed the request for review from Reminiscent September 5, 2019 08:10
@qw4990 qw4990 mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2019
Closed
@zz-jason
Copy link
Member

zz-jason commented Sep 9, 2019

to #12058

zz-jason
zz-jason reviewed Sep 10, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@zz-jason zz-jason left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@zz-jason zz-jason added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Sep 10, 2019
@qw4990 qw4990 mentioned this pull request Sep 10, 2019
Closed
XuHuaiyu
XuHuaiyu approved these changes Sep 11, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu added status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Sep 11, 2019
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 11, 2019

/run-all-tests

@sre-bot sre-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2019
Merged
@sre-bot sre-bot merged commit 4b6c38d into pingcap:master Sep 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ngaut ngaut ngaut left review comments

@zz-jason zz-jason zz-jason left review comments

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
component/expression status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@qw4990 @zz-jason @sre-bot @ngaut @XuHuaiyu