Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: query failed after add index / timestamp out-of-range (#28424) (#29323) #30986

Closed

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Dec 23, 2021

cherry-pick #29323 to release-5.3
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/30986

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push git@github.com:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/30986:release-5.3-9d4da4f3fb05

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #28424

Problem Summary: Timestamp out-of-range and range optimizer incompatibility.

What is changed and how it works?

Two issues, convertToMysqlTimestamp did set out-of-range timestamp to
Zero, when it would still be a storable/comparable KindMysqlTime.
(we only artificially limit the range of Timestamp to be compatible
with MySQL).

When this change was done,
it broke #26584 (insert of invalid timestamp succeeded),
which needed a different change in handleZeroDatetime

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Fixed index handling bug with timestamp out-of-range.

Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Dec 23, 2021

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • tiancaiamao
  • xhebox

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ti-srebot: This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by release team.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick, it must first be approved by the collaborators.

AFTER it has been approved by collaborators, please ping the release team in a comment to request a cherry pick review.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. labels Dec 23, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. label Dec 23, 2021
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.3-cherry-pick labels Dec 23, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mjonss you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Dec 24, 2021
@xhebox
Copy link
Contributor

xhebox commented Jan 26, 2022

/cc @mjonss do we still cherry-pick this and #30985?

@mjonss
Copy link
Contributor

mjonss commented Jan 27, 2022

/cc @mjonss do we still cherry-pick this and #30985?

@xhebox Not sure, since #28424 is just minor.

@time-and-fate do you still want this cherry-picked to 5.2 and 5.3?

@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

@mjonss Do we need to merge this to 5.3. Because a new version is about to release.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Feb 16, 2022
@VelocityLight
Copy link

This pull request is closed because the related issue is triaged "Won't Fix".
If it's still needed, you can reopen it or just regenerate it using bot,
see:

You can find more details at:

@mjonss mjonss deleted the release-5.3-9d4da4f3fb05 branch September 22, 2022 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/5.3-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants