Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

*: seperate TxnScope and ReplicaReadScope #35877

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 5, 2022
Merged

*: seperate TxnScope and ReplicaReadScope #35877

merged 15 commits into from
Jul 5, 2022

Conversation

lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator

@lcwangchao lcwangchao commented Jul 1, 2022 •
edited
Loading

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #31772

What is changed and how it works?

  • Two new methods added to TxnManager
    • GetTxnScope returns the scope for current txn. TxnScope is used by local transaction
    • GetReadReplicaScope returns the read replica scope. ReadReplicaScope is used to read other replica instead of leader.
  • Stale read will always return a kv.GlobalScope for TxnScope to skip local txn check.
  • Stale read will always use local scope to do replica read
  • For other providers, if local txn is enabled or closest read is enabled, we should use local txn's scope to do replica read.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jul 1, 2022 •
edited
Loading

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • Yisaer
  • xhebox

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 1, 2022
@lcwangchao lcwangchao marked this pull request as draft July 1, 2022 05:08
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 1, 2022
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-unit-test

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 1, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Code Coverage Details: https://codecov.io/github/pingcap/tidb/commit/6a45fef7201cc2a7893b4be621039da4406074a3

@lcwangchao lcwangchao marked this pull request as ready for review July 4, 2022 03:13
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 4, 2022
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-check_dev_2

xhebox
xhebox reviewed Jul 4, 2022
View reviewed changes
executor/batch_point_get.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sessiontxn/isolation/base.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jul 4, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jul 4, 2022
@xhebox
Copy link
Contributor

xhebox commented Jul 4, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: dcdce8a

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jul 4, 2022
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-unit-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jul 4, 2022
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: fe4cb85

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jul 4, 2022
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-check_dev_2

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jul 4, 2022
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 7286ad2

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jul 4, 2022
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-check_dev_2

1 similar comment
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/run-check_dev_2

@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-mysql-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 157c178 into pingcap:master Jul 5, 2022
@lcwangchao lcwangchao deleted the txn_read_replica_scope branch July 5, 2022 03:41
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 5, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 35 tests passed 26 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🟢 all 11 tests passed 24 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 12 tests passed 11 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 6 min 16 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 5 min 57 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 5 min 8 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 4 min 47 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 37 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 27 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

@SpadeA-Tang SpadeA-Tang mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2022
Merged
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@xhebox xhebox xhebox approved these changes

@Yisaer Yisaer Yisaer approved these changes

@JmPotato JmPotato Awaiting requested review from JmPotato

@SpadeA-Tang SpadeA-Tang Awaiting requested review from SpadeA-Tang

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Decouple the term TxnScope from the Stale Read code
6 participants
@lcwangchao @ti-chi-bot @sre-bot @xhebox @hawkingrei @Yisaer