tests: add suppression for memcheck

[lukaszstolarczuk]

ref. #1262

---

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1263 (fb91098) into stable-1.13 (f49772a) will decrease coverage by 1.78%.
The diff coverage is 69.04%.

❗ Current head fb91098 differs from pull request most recent head 7a78bb5. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7a78bb5 to get more accurate results

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           stable-1.13    #1263      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        95.52%   93.74%   -1.79%     
===============================================
  Files               53       53              
  Lines             6755     4573    -2182     
===============================================
- Hits              6453     4287    -2166     
+ Misses             302      286      -16     

Flag	Coverage Δ
tests_clang_debug_cpp17	93.46% <68.96%> (-1.66%)	⬇️
tests_gcc_debug	90.37% <74.22%> (-2.00%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
include/libpmemobj++/allocator.hpp	71.42% <0.00%> (-7.82%)	⬇️
include/libpmemobj++/condition_variable.hpp	72.97% <0.00%> (-7.42%)	⬇️
include/libpmemobj++/container/array.hpp	97.33% <ø> (-0.80%)	⬇️
include/libpmemobj++/container/basic_string.hpp	98.69% <ø> (-0.63%)	⬇️
...j++/container/detail/concurrent_skip_list_impl.hpp	96.69% <ø> (-1.02%)	⬇️
include/libpmemobj++/container/segment_vector.hpp	93.15% <ø> (-2.30%)	⬇️
include/libpmemobj++/detail/ebr.hpp	95.74% <ø> (-2.89%)	⬇️
include/libpmemobj++/detail/pair.hpp	100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/libpmemobj++/detail/tagged_ptr.hpp	100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/libpmemobj++/detail/temp_value.hpp	100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 68 more

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

[igchor]

but this should be opened against stable-1.13 I think (@kilobyte reported the issue for 1.13)

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @lukaszstolarczuk)

[lukaszstolarczuk]

this should be opened against stable-1.13 I think (@kilobyte reported the issue for 1.13)

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @lukaszstolarczuk)

good point, re-based.

[lukaszstolarczuk]

I had to add a commit (cherry-picked from master) with the PMDK version update, due to CI failure.

[kilobyte]

WFM.
Tagged and bagged.

[lukaszstolarczuk]

for this PR to work (and the whole stable-1.13 branch), we'd have to apply 2 CI fixes: Windows workflow update and the newest PMDK installed (both cherry-picked here). I'm not sure if we want (and need) to do this now - we're applying these fixes into stable-1.9, and we can wait for them to be merged, bottom to top.

[Karolina002]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, 1 of 1 files at r3, 1 of 1 files at r4, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @lukaszstolarczuk)

[karczex]

Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @lukaszstolarczuk)