Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solve structure inconsistency of partitioned-heat-conduction-direct #497

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

Fujikawas
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to issue #461

@Fujikawas Fujikawas changed the title solve structure inconsistency of partitioned-heat-conduction-direct Solve structure inconsistency of partitioned-heat-conduction-direct Mar 22, 2024
@Fujikawas Fujikawas requested a review from MakisH March 22, 2024 10:40
Copy link
Member

@MakisH MakisH left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The directory structure is fine, thank you! You could still consider merging the solvers into one and read configuration files.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similarly to #496 (cc @IshaanDesai), the two solvers are almost identical, apart from configuration. This is fine for now, but ideally the solver could be merged into solver-nutils/heat.py and each case would read a short configuration file, or just a keyword dirichlet/neumann.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's keep the duplication for now to move on, and we can make this nicer later.

@MakisH MakisH merged commit 3b07b1d into develop Mar 22, 2024
1 check passed
@MakisH MakisH deleted the phc-direkt-consistency branch March 22, 2024 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants