-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pixi cannot detect glibc
2.39 on gentoo but micromamba can
#1609
Comments
Ah that is strange, this is part of our Rattler library. This is the code that find the version: https://github.com/mamba-org/rattler/blob/main/crates/rattler_virtual_packages/src/libc.rs#L34 Does this ring a bell for you that might help us understand why it's not getting the version? Also pinging @baszalmstra for his expertise |
@SobhanMP What is the output when you run:
|
❯ ldd --version
ldd (Gentoo 2.39-r9 (patchset 9)) 2.39
Copyright (C) 2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Written by Roland McGrath and Ulrich Drepper. regardless of whether having the string GLIBC or GNU LIBC is required or not, a fix is very much appreciated. |
Im attempting a fix in conda/rattler#779 |
thanks! |
Works like a charm! thanks. |
Checks
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pixi, using
pixi --version
.Reproducible example
Issue description
I have glibc 2.39 on my machine, but Pixi doesn't recognize it as a valid
__glibc
, while Mamba does.Expected behavior
Pixi should recognize glibc 2.39
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: