Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove LazyQuery.jl and StructuredQuery.jl #283

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2019
Merged

remove LazyQuery.jl and StructuredQuery.jl #283

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2019

Conversation

xiaodaigh
Copy link
Contributor

LazyQuery.jl websites gives 404 and StructuredQuery.jl hasn't been updated for 3 years and only works on 0.5

LazyQuery.jl websites gives 404 and StructuredQuery.jl hasn't been updated for 3 years and only works on 0.5
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #283 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #283   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.43%   91.43%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         432      432           
=======================================
  Hits          395      395           
  Misses         37       37

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e431ca2...10a85cf. Read the comment docs.

@davidanthoff davidanthoff merged commit 5ceadbe into queryverse:master Sep 18, 2019
@davidanthoff
Copy link
Member

Good call! We should probably add LightQuery.jl, @bramtayl ?

@bramtayl
Copy link
Contributor

Sure! Hopefully I'll get to the SQLite blogpost sometime soon, sorry things have been a bit busy here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants