Unrolled build for rust-lang#123366

Rollup merge of rust-lang#123366 - oli-obk:cleanups_async_closures, r=compiler-errors

Minor by_move_body impl cleanups

r? `@compiler-errors`

compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coroutine/by_move_body.rs

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 //! be a coroutine body that takes all of its upvars by-move, and which we stash
 //! into the `CoroutineInfo` for all coroutines returned by coroutine-closures.
 
-use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxIndexSet;
+use rustc_data_structures::unord::UnordSet;
 use rustc_hir as hir;
 use rustc_middle::mir::visit::MutVisitor;
 use rustc_middle::mir::{self, dump_mir, MirPass};
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for ByMoveBody {
             return;
         }
 
-        let mut by_ref_fields = FxIndexSet::default();
+        let mut by_ref_fields = UnordSet::default();
         let by_move_upvars = Ty::new_tup_from_iter(
             tcx,
             tcx.closure_captures(coroutine_def_id).iter().enumerate().map(|(idx, capture)| {
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for ByMoveBody {
 
 struct MakeByMoveBody<'tcx> {
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
-    by_ref_fields: FxIndexSet<FieldIdx>,
+    by_ref_fields: UnordSet<FieldIdx>,
     by_move_coroutine_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
 }
 
@@ -89,11 +89,11 @@ impl<'tcx> MutVisitor<'tcx> for MakeByMoveBody<'tcx> {
         location: mir::Location,
     ) {
         if place.local == ty::CAPTURE_STRUCT_LOCAL
-            && !place.projection.is_empty()
-            && let mir::ProjectionElem::Field(idx, ty) = place.projection[0]
+            && let Some((&mir::ProjectionElem::Field(idx, ty), projection)) =
+                place.projection.split_first()
             && self.by_ref_fields.contains(&idx)
         {
-            let (begin, end) = place.projection[1..].split_first().unwrap();
+            let (begin, end) = projection.split_first().unwrap();
             // FIXME(async_closures): I'm actually a bit surprised to see that we always
             // initially deref the by-ref upvars. If this is not actually true, then we
             // will at least get an ICE that explains why this isn't true :^)