Add 1.60.0 blog post

[Mark-Simulacrum]

This just inlines the release notes from rust-lang/rust#94817, but they aren't yet ready -- several more rounds of revision will be necessary there.

cc @rust-lang/release

@pnkfelix @wesleywiser This contains a section on incr comp status; I wrote up some language presuming we leave things enabled, but that can be iterated based on future decisions -- maybe at next week's planning meeting. Happy to see revisions of the text there.

[ehuss]

TYVM for putting this together!

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@ehuss Thanks! I think the new text is indeed better. Are there plans to make the default syntax the "thing you want"? I wonder if we could make a slight reference to the next edition there, for example.

But probably isn't worth it.

[ehuss]

There are no plans at this time to change the behavior. It could be considered, but is currently not on our radar.

[richkadel]

@wesleywiser - Thanks for putting this together! Some suggestions.

[pietroalbini]

Looks good!

[Mark-Simulacrum]

Pushed updates per @richkadel's review -- thanks!

[joshtriplett]

I think we need to add the Duration changes to the blog post.

[joshtriplett]

The Duration changes are now documented in the release notes; the corresponding section needs to get copied to the blog post.

[Mark-Simulacrum]

I pushed a section, but I'm not particularly happy with it. Maybe we just cut down on what it says to something more barebones, not sure. It may make sense to promote some more of the discussion in rust-lang/rust#89926 to here.

[pietroalbini]

I think the snippet you wrote works. @rust-lang/core can someone approve this so I can merge it tomorrow as part of the 1.60.0 release process?

[joshtriplett]

Looks good to me. Some minor edits, no semantic changes.