-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Nonterminal
and TokenKind::Interpolated
#124141
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Remove Nonterminal
and TokenKind::Interpolated
#124141
Conversation
Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt cc @rust-lang/rustfmt |
42a623a
to
c133e16
Compare
❤️ @nnethercote for working on this. Thank you! I'm not sure if there's a way for me to help, as someone who doesn't really know much about the compiler innards, but please LMK if you think of something. |
@ijackson: thanks! I'm curious why you are interested in this change, given that it's a compiler internals rearrangement? |
After this is done |
Yes. |
Instead of using AST pretty printing. This is a step towards removing `token::Interpolated`, which will eventually (in rust-lang#124141) be replaced with a token stream within invisible delimiters. This changes (improves) the output of the `stringify!` macro in some cases. This is allowed. As the `stringify!` docs say: "Note that the expanded results of the input tokens may change in the future. You should be careful if you rely on the output." Test changes: - tests/ui/macros/stringify.rs: this used to test both token stream pretty printing and AST pretty printing via different ways of invoking of `stringify!` (i.e. `$expr` vs `$tt`). But those two different invocations now give the same result, which is a nice consistency improvement. This removes the need for the `c2!` macro. - tests/ui/macros/trace_faulty_macros.rs: there is some sub-optimal spacing in the printing of `A { a : a, b : 0, c : _, .. }`, which will be fixed in the next commit. The spacing of `1+1` improves -- it now matches the formatting in the source code. - tests/ui/proc-macro/*: minor improvements where small differences between `INPUT (DISPLAY)` output and `DEEP-RE-COLLECTED (DISPLAY)` output disappear.
c133e16
to
7aef5db
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Instead of using AST pretty printing. This is a step towards removing `token::Interpolated`, which will eventually (in rust-lang#124141) be replaced with a token stream within invisible delimiters. This changes (improves) the output of the `stringify!` macro in some cases. This is allowed. As the `stringify!` docs say: "Note that the expanded results of the input tokens may change in the future. You should be careful if you rely on the output." Test changes: - tests/ui/macros/stringify.rs: this used to test both token stream pretty printing and AST pretty printing via different ways of invoking of `stringify!` (i.e. `$expr` vs `$tt`). But those two different invocations now give the same result, which is a nice consistency improvement. This removes the need for the `c2!` macro. - tests/ui/macros/trace_faulty_macros.rs: there is some sub-optimal spacing in the printing of `A { a : a, b : 0, c : _, .. }`, which will be fixed in the next commit. The spacing of `1+1` improves -- it now matches the formatting in the source code. - tests/ui/proc-macro/*: minor improvements where small differences between `INPUT (DISPLAY)` output and `DEEP-RE-COLLECTED (DISPLAY)` output disappear.
…, r=<try> Print `token::Interpolated` with token stream pretty printing. This is a step towards removing `token::Interpolated` (rust-lang#124141). It unavoidably changes the output of the `stringify!` macro, generally for the better. r? `@petrochenkov`
#125174 carves off a piece of this PR so it can be merged separately. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #123865) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Add tests for `-Zunpretty=expanded` ported from stringify's tests This PR adds a new set of tests for the AST pretty-printer. Previously, pretty-printer edge cases were tested by way of `stringify!` in [tests/ui/macros/stringify.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.78.0/tests/ui/macros/stringify.rs), such as the tests added by rust-lang@419b269 and rust-lang@527e2ea. Those tests will no longer provide effective coverage of the AST pretty-printer after rust-lang#124141. `Nonterminal` and `TokenKind::Interpolated` are being removed, and a consequence is that `stringify!` will perform token stream pretty printing, instead of AST pretty printing, in all of the `stringify!` cases including $:expr and all other interpolations. This PR adds 2 new ui tests with `compile-flags: -Zunpretty=expanded`: - **tests/ui/unpretty/expanded-exhaustive.rs** — this test aims for exhaustive coverage of all the variants of `ExprKind`, `ItemKind`, `PatKind`, `StmtKind`, `TyKind`, and `VisibilityKind`. Some parts could use being fleshed out further, but the current state is roughly on par with what exists in the old stringify-based tests. - **tests/ui/unpretty/expanded-interpolation.rs** — this test covers tricky macro metavariable edge cases that require the AST pretty printer to synthesize parentheses in order for the printed code to be valid Rust syntax. r? `@nnethercote`
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125236 - dtolnay:expandtest, r=nnethercote Add tests for `-Zunpretty=expanded` ported from stringify's tests This PR adds a new set of tests for the AST pretty-printer. Previously, pretty-printer edge cases were tested by way of `stringify!` in [tests/ui/macros/stringify.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.78.0/tests/ui/macros/stringify.rs), such as the tests added by rust-lang@419b269 and rust-lang@527e2ea. Those tests will no longer provide effective coverage of the AST pretty-printer after rust-lang#124141. `Nonterminal` and `TokenKind::Interpolated` are being removed, and a consequence is that `stringify!` will perform token stream pretty printing, instead of AST pretty printing, in all of the `stringify!` cases including $:expr and all other interpolations. This PR adds 2 new ui tests with `compile-flags: -Zunpretty=expanded`: - **tests/ui/unpretty/expanded-exhaustive.rs** — this test aims for exhaustive coverage of all the variants of `ExprKind`, `ItemKind`, `PatKind`, `StmtKind`, `TyKind`, and `VisibilityKind`. Some parts could use being fleshed out further, but the current state is roughly on par with what exists in the old stringify-based tests. - **tests/ui/unpretty/expanded-interpolation.rs** — this test covers tricky macro metavariable edge cases that require the AST pretty printer to synthesize parentheses in order for the printed code to be valid Rust syntax. r? `@nnethercote`
Instead of using AST pretty printing. This is a step towards removing `token::Interpolated`, which will eventually (in rust-lang#124141) be replaced with a token stream within invisible delimiters. This changes (improves) the output of the `stringify!` macro in some cases. This is allowed. As the `stringify!` docs say: "Note that the expanded results of the input tokens may change in the future. You should be careful if you rely on the output." Test changes: - tests/ui/macros/stringify.rs: this used to test both token stream pretty printing and AST pretty printing via different ways of invoking of `stringify!` (i.e. `$expr` vs `$tt`). But those two different invocations now give the same result, which is a nice consistency improvement. This removes the need for all the `c2*` macros. The AST pretty printer now has more thorough testing thanks to rust-lang#125236. - tests/ui/proc-macro/*: minor improvements where small differences between `INPUT (DISPLAY)` output and `DEEP-RE-COLLECTED (DISPLAY)` output disappear.
It's great to see that Of course it prevents a lot of interesting stuff like reparsing |
How hard would it be to get this to a perf run? |
Could not assign reviewer from: |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
…Kind-Interpolated, r=<try> Remove `Nonterminal` and `TokenKind::Interpolated` A third attempt at this; the first attempt was rust-lang#96724 and the second was rust-lang#114647. r? `@ghost`
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@craterbot check |
👌 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
Finished benchmarking commit (4882bfc): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDEDBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -2.5%, secondary 6.0%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (primary 3.0%, secondary 7.0%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeResults (primary 0.0%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 756.373s -> 775.217s (2.49%) |
[CRATER] Crater rollup This is a crater rollup of: * rust-lang#124141 * rust-lang#130285 * rust-lang#130367 **What is a crater rollup?** It's simply a (manually set-up) crater job that is run on all of the containing PRs together, and then we can set the crates list for each of these jobs to *just* the list of failures after it's done. It should cut out on the bulk of "normal" crates that do nothing and simply just waste time to build without being affected by the union of all of these changes. After this is finished, I will adjust all of the jobs to use only the list of failed crates. That should significantly speed up these jobs from taking like ~6 days to taking ~2. See the last time I did this: rust-lang#129660. Given that rust-lang#130285 is running in build-and-test mode, let's run all of them in build-and-test mode.
🚧 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
Merge `PatParam`/`PatWithOr`, and `Expr`/`Expr2021`, for a few reasons. - It's conceptually nice, because the two pattern kinds and the two expression kinds are very similar. - With expressions in particular, there are several places where both expression kinds get the same treatment. - It removes one unreachable match arm. - Most importantly, for rust-lang#124141 I will need to introduce a new type `MetaVarKind` that is very similar to `NonterminalKind`, but records a couple of extra fields for expression metavars. It's nicer to have a single `MetaVarKind::Expr` expression variant to hold those extra fields instead of duplicating them across two variants `MetaVarKind::{Expr,Expr2021}`. And then it makes sense for patterns to be treated the same way, and for `NonterminalKind` to also be treated the same way. I also clarified the comments, because I have long found them a little hard to understand.
…r=compiler-errors Rework pattern and expression nonterminal kinds. Some tweaks to `NonterminalKind` that will assist with rust-lang#124141. Details in the individual commits. r? compiler-errors cc ```@eholk```
🎉 Experiment
|
Ugh, lots of failures to investigate. |
It currently doesn't handle the three-char tokens `>>=` and `<<=` correctly. These can be broken twice, resulting in three individual tokens. This is a latent bug that currently doesn't cause any problems, but does cause problems for rust-lang#124141, because that PR increases the usage of lazy token streams.
I have found and fixed two sources of failures.
|
It currently doesn't handle the three-char tokens `>>=` and `<<=` correctly. These can be broken twice, resulting in three individual tokens. This is a latent bug that currently doesn't cause any problems, but does cause problems for rust-lang#124141, because that PR increases the usage of lazy token streams.
It currently doesn't handle the three-char tokens `>>=` and `<<=` correctly. These can be broken twice, resulting in three individual tokens. This is a latent bug that currently doesn't cause any problems, but does cause problems for rust-lang#124141, because that PR increases the usage of lazy token streams.
A third attempt at this; the first attempt was #96724 and the second was #114647.
r? @ghost