Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put the dots back in RTN pretty printing #127783

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Also don't render RTN-like bounds for methods with ty/const params.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 15, 2024

r? @fee1-dead

rustbot has assigned @fee1-dead.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 15, 2024
@@ -1214,11 +1214,14 @@ pub trait PrettyPrinter<'tcx>: Printer<'tcx> + fmt::Write {
&& let ty::Alias(_, alias_ty) =
self.tcx().fn_sig(fn_def_id).skip_binder().output().skip_binder().kind()
&& alias_ty.def_id == def_id
&& let generics = self.tcx().generics_of(fn_def_id)
// FIXME(return_type_notation): We only support lifetime params for now.
&& generics.own_params.iter().all(|param| matches!(param.kind, ty::GenericParamDefKind::Lifetime))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this condition testable? I.e. a case where this would have gone through and printed but no longer prints now?

@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

awaiting response from review

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 17, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah I added a test.

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 17, 2024
Copy link
Member

@fee1-dead fee1-dead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks.

@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 18, 2024

📌 Commit b84e2b7 has been approved by fee1-dead

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 18, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#127077 (Make language around `ToOwned` for `BorrowedFd` more precise)
 - rust-lang#127783 (Put the dots back in RTN pretty printing)
 - rust-lang#127787 (Migrate `atomic-lock-free` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#127810 (Rename `tcx` to `cx` in `rustc_type_ir`)
 - rust-lang#127878 (Fix associated item removal suggestion)
 - rust-lang#127886 (Accurate `use` rename suggestion span)
 - rust-lang#127888 (More accurate span for type parameter suggestion)
 - rust-lang#127889 (More accurate span for anonymous argument suggestion)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 97d5edf into rust-lang:master Jul 18, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jul 18, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127783 - compiler-errors:rtn-pretty, r=fee1-dead

Put the dots back in RTN pretty printing

Also don't render RTN-like bounds for methods with ty/const params.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants