Rollup of 9 pull requests #39895
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #39895
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Group "missing variable bind" spans in `or` matches and clarify wording for the two possible cases: when a variable from the first pattern is not in any of the subsequent patterns, and when a variable in any of the other patterns is not in the first one. Before: ``` error[E0408]: variable `a` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern rust-lang#2 --> file.rs:10:23 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `a` error[E0408]: variable `b` from pattern rust-lang#2 is not bound in pattern #1 --> file.rs:10:32 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^ pattern doesn't bind `b` error[E0408]: variable `a` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern rust-lang#3 --> file.rs:10:37 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `a` error[E0408]: variable `d` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern rust-lang#3 --> file.rs:10:37 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `d` error[E0408]: variable `c` from pattern rust-lang#3 is not bound in pattern #1 --> file.rs:10:43 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^ pattern doesn't bind `c` error[E0408]: variable `d` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern rust-lang#4 --> file.rs:10:48 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `d` error: aborting due to 6 previous errors ``` After: ``` error[E0408]: variable `d` from pattern #1 isn't bound in patterns rust-lang#3, rust-lang#4 --> file.rs:10:37 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | - ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `d` | | | | missing variable pattern doesn't bind `d` error[E0408]: variable `a` from pattern #1 isn't bound in patterns rust-lang#2, rust-lang#3 --> file.rs:10:23 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | - ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `a` | | | | | pattern doesn't bind `a` | missing variable error[E0408]: variable `b` from pattern rust-lang#2, variable `c` from pattern rust-lang#3 aren't bound in pattern #1 --> file.rs:10:32 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ----------- ^ ^ missing variable | | | | | missing variable | pattern does't bind `b`, `c` error: aborting due to 3 previous errors ```
As we continue to add more crates to the compiler and use them to implement various features we want to be sure we're not accidentally expanding the API surface area of the compiler! To that end this commit adds a new `run-make` test which will attempt to `extern crate foo` all crates in the sysroot, verifying that they're all unstable. This commit discovered that the `std_shim` and `test_shim` crates were accidentally stable and fixes the situation by deleting those shims. The shims are no longer necessary due to changes in Cargo that have happened since they were originally incepted.
Previously InlineAsm was an Rvalue, but its semantics doesn’t really match the semantics of an Rvalue – rather it behaves more like a Statement.
This is a simple way to workaround the debugging issues caused by the rustc
wrapper used in the bootstrap process. Namely, it uses some obscure environment
variables and you can’t just copy the failed command and run it in the shell or
debugger to examine the failure more closely.
With `--on-fail` its possible to run an arbitrary command within exactly the
same environment under which rustc failed. Theres’s multiple ways to use this
new flag:
$ python x.py build --stage=1 --on-fail=env
would print a list of environment variables and the failed command, so a
few copy-pastes and you now can run the same rust in your shell outside the
bootstrap system.
$ python x.py build --stage=1 --on-fail=bash
Is a more useful variation of the command above in that it launches a whole
shell with environment already in place! All that’s left to do is copy-paste
the command just above the shell prompt!
Fixes rust-lang#38686
Fixes rust-lang#38221
…rner Clean up "pattern doesn't bind x" messages Group "missing variable bind" spans in `or` matches and clarify wording for the two possible cases: when a variable from the first pattern is not in any of the subsequent patterns, and when a variable in any of the other patterns is not in the first one. Before: ```rust error[E0408]: variable `a` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern rust-lang#2 --> file.rs:10:23 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `a` error[E0408]: variable `b` from pattern rust-lang#2 is not bound in pattern #1 --> file.rs:10:32 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^ pattern doesn't bind `b` error[E0408]: variable `a` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern rust-lang#3 --> file.rs:10:37 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `a` error[E0408]: variable `d` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern rust-lang#3 --> file.rs:10:37 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `d` error[E0408]: variable `c` from pattern rust-lang#3 is not bound in pattern #1 --> file.rs:10:43 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^ pattern doesn't bind `c` error[E0408]: variable `d` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern rust-lang#4 --> file.rs:10:48 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `d` error: aborting due to 6 previous errors ``` After: ```rust error[E0408]: variable `d` is not bound in all patterns --> $DIR/issue-39698.rs:20:37 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | - - ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `d` | | | | | | | pattern doesn't bind `d` | | variable not in all patterns | variable not in all patterns error[E0408]: variable `c` is not bound in all patterns --> $DIR/issue-39698.rs:20:48 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ - ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `c` | | | | | | | variable not in all patterns | | pattern doesn't bind `c` | pattern doesn't bind `c` error[E0408]: variable `a` is not bound in all patterns --> $DIR/issue-39698.rs:20:37 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | - ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ - variable not in all patterns | | | | | | | pattern doesn't bind `a` | | pattern doesn't bind `a` | variable not in all patterns error[E0408]: variable `b` is not bound in all patterns --> $DIR/issue-39698.rs:20:37 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^ - ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `b` | | | | | | | pattern doesn't bind `b` | | variable not in all patterns | pattern doesn't bind `b` error: aborting due to 4 previous errors ``` Fixes rust-lang#39698.
Correct a typo in procedural macros chapter of the Book. A simple and short correction for procedural macros chapter of the Rust Programming Language Book.
test: Verify all sysroot crates are unstable As we continue to add more crates to the compiler and use them to implement various features we want to be sure we're not accidentally expanding the API surface area of the compiler! To that end this commit adds a new `run-make` test which will attempt to `extern crate foo` all crates in the sysroot, verifying that they're all unstable. This commit discovered that the `std_shim` and `test_shim` crates were accidentally stable and fixes the situation by deleting those shims. The shims are no longer necessary due to changes in Cargo that have happened since they were originally incepted.
[MIR] Make InlineAsm a Statement Previously InlineAsm was an Rvalue, but its semantics doesn’t really match the semantics of an Rvalue – rather it behaves more like a Statement. r? @nikomatsakis you wanted this to happen
…e-path, r=alexcrichton Set rustdoc --test files' path relative to the current directory r? @alexcrichton
…illaumeGomez Fix wording in LocalKey documentation Fixes rust-lang#39841 r? @GuillaumeGomez
Fixes overflow in libsdt/io/cursor.rs "seek" Fixes rust-lang#39631 Test which fails (with old implementation), then fix to implementation.
…chton
[rustbuild] add a way to run command after failure
This is a simple way to workaround the debugging issues caused by the rustc
wrapper used in the bootstrap process. Namely, it uses some obscure environment
variables and you can’t just copy the failed command and run it in the shell or
debugger to examine the failure more closely.
With `--on-fail` its possible to run an arbitrary command within exactly the
same environment under which rustc failed. Theres’s multiple ways to use this
new flag:
$ python x.py build --stage=1 --on-fail=env
would print a list of environment variables and the failed command, so a
few copy-pastes and you now can run the same rust in your shell outside the
bootstrap system.
$ python x.py build --stage=1 --on-fail=bash
Is a more useful variation of the command above in that it launches a whole
shell with environment already in place! All that’s left to do is copy-paste
the command just above the shell prompt!
Fixes rust-lang#38686
Fixes rust-lang#38221
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @pnkfelix (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
|
@bors r+ p=10 |
|
📌 Commit 79d4c84 has been approved by |
|
⌛ Testing commit 79d4c84 with merge 9008ea5... |
|
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Substs::params()#39877, [rustbuild] add a way to run command after failure #39888