Rollup of 8 pull requests #83454
Merged
Rollup of 8 pull requests #83454
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Yuki Okushi <huyuumi.dev@gmail.com>
This change was backed out in rust-lang#83412 so we should remove the reference to it from the release notes.
THis came up in the review of rust-lang#83425: it's hard to imagine a use of LLVM_VERSION_LE() or LLVM_VERSION_EQ() that's not asking for trouble when a point release gets created, so let's just discard them to prevent the issue.
stabilize debug_non_exhaustive tracking issue: rust-lang#67364 but it is still an open question whether the other `Debug*` struct's should have a similar method. I would guess that would best be put underneath a new feature gate, as this one seems uncontroversial enough to stabilize as is
Remove Option::{unwrap_none, expect_none}.
This removes `Option::unwrap_none` and `Option::expect_none` since we're not going to stabilize them, see rust-lang#62633.
Closes rust-lang#62633
…c, r=CraftSpider Add documentation for rustdoc-gui tests I think a bit of documentation doesn't hurt in this case considering how "out of the ordinary" this is. r? ``@jyn514``
Add Result::into_err where the Ok variant is the never type Equivalent of rust-lang#66045 but for the inverse situation where `T: Into<!>` rather than `E: Into<!>`. I'm using the same feature gate name. I can't see why one of these methods would be OK to stabilize but not the other. Tracking issue: rust-lang#61695
small cleanups in rustc_errors / emitter This is either moving code around so it gets called less often or using if let instead of match in a few cases.
…-Simulacrum Update RELEASES.md This change was backed out in rust-lang#83412 so we should remove the reference to it from the release notes.
…n514 Use intra-doc link in core::cell ``@rustbot`` label T-doc A-intra-doc-links r? ``@jyn514``
… r=cuviper LLVMWrapper: attractive nuisance macros This came up in the review of rust-lang#83425: it's hard to imagine a use of LLVM_VERSION_LE() or LLVM_VERSION_EQ() that's not asking for trouble when a point release gets created, so let's just discard them to prevent the issue.
|
@bors r+ p=8 rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit 67436c1 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced Mar 25, 2021
|
📣 Toolstate changed by #83454! Tested on commit 26c7e55. 💔 rls on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Xanewok). |
rust-highfive
added a commit
to rust-lang-nursery/rust-toolstate
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2021
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@26c7e55. Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#83454> 💔 rls on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Xanewok). 💔 rls on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @Xanewok). 💔 rustfmt on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @topecongiro @calebcartwright). 💔 rustfmt on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @topecongiro @calebcartwright).
This was referenced Mar 25, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup