Rollup of 6 pull requests #83692
Merged
Rollup of 6 pull requests #83692
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We don't need to complain to the user about linkcheck having different hosts and targets when it is already excluded. This can be achieved by moving the check to when the step is run instead of in should_run.
…r=camelid,jyn514 Make documentation of which items the prelude exports more readable. I recently figured out that rustdoc allows link inside of inline code blocks as long as they’re delimited with `<code> </code>` instead of `` ` ` ``. I think this applies nicely in the listing of prelude exports [in the docs](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/prelude/index.html). There, currently unformatted `::` and `{ , }` is used in order to mimick import syntax while attatching links to individual identifiers. ## Rendered Comparison ### Currently (light)  ### After this PR (light)  ### Currently (dark)  ### After this PR (dark)  ### Currently (ayu)  ### After this PR (ayu)  _Edit:_ I just noticed, the “current” screenshots are from stable, so there are a few more differences in the pictures than the ones from just this PR.
Do not emit a suggestion that causes the E0632 error Fixes rust-lang#83606
…-DPC Add a regression test for issue-75801 Closes rust-lang#75801 r? ``@Aaron1011``
…nflict, r=jyn514 Fix Self keyword doc URL conflict on case insensitive file systems (until definitely fixed on rustdoc) This is just a hack to allow rustup to work on macOS and windows again to distribute std documentation (hopefully once rust-lang/rfcs#3097 or an equivalent is merged). Fixes rust-lang#80504. Prevents rust-lang#83154 and rust-lang/rustup#2694 in future releases. cc ``@kinnison`` r? ``@jyn514``
Update for loop desugaring docs It looks like the documentation for `for` loops was not updated to match the new de-sugaring process.
…mulacrum bootstrap: don't complain about linkcheck if it is excluded We don't need to complain to the user about linkcheck having different hosts and targets when it is already excluded. Resolves rust-lang#83661
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
|
📌 Commit 7a587f0 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup