Hide <...> defined here note if the source is not available
#89233
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 911ced0 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2021
Hide `<...> defined here` note if the source is not available Fixes rust-lang#89159. Similar to rust-lang#87088. r? `@estebank`
This was referenced Sep 28, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2021
…laumeGomez Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#87260 (Libgccjit codegen) - rust-lang#89212 (x.py: run `rustup toolchain link` in setup) - rust-lang#89233 (Hide `<...> defined here` note if the source is not available) - rust-lang#89235 (make junit output more consistent with default format) - rust-lang#89255 (Fix incorrect disambiguation suggestion for associated items) - rust-lang#89276 (Fix the population of the `union.impls` field) - rust-lang#89283 (Add regression test for issue rust-lang#83564) - rust-lang#89318 (rustc_session: Remove lint store from `Session`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2021
…l, r=cjgillot Improve error message for `E0659` if the source is not available Fixes rust-lang#91028. The fix is similar to those in rust-lang#89233 and rust-lang#87088. With this change, instead of the dangling ``` note: `Option` could also refer to the enum defined here ``` I get ``` note: `Option` could also refer to an enum from prelude ``` If the standard library source code _is_ available, the output does not change.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2021
…l, r=cjgillot Improve error message for `E0659` if the source is not available Fixes rust-lang#91028. The fix is similar to those in rust-lang#89233 and rust-lang#87088. With this change, instead of the dangling ``` note: `Option` could also refer to the enum defined here ``` I get ``` note: `Option` could also refer to an enum from prelude ``` If the standard library source code _is_ available, the output does not change.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2021
…l, r=cjgillot Improve error message for `E0659` if the source is not available Fixes rust-lang#91028. The fix is similar to those in rust-lang#89233 and rust-lang#87088. With this change, instead of the dangling ``` note: `Option` could also refer to the enum defined here ``` I get ``` note: `Option` could also refer to an enum from prelude ``` If the standard library source code _is_ available, the output does not change.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #89159. Similar to #87088.
r? @estebank