Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Help optimize out backtraces when disabled #92992

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2022

Conversation

kornelski
Copy link
Contributor

@kornelski kornelski commented Jan 17, 2022

The comment in rust_backtrace_env says:

// If the backtrace feature of this crate isn't enabled quickly return
// None so this can be constant propagated all over the place to turn
// optimize away callers.

but this optimization has regressed, because the only caller of this function had an alternative path that unconditionally (and pointlessly) asked for a full backtrace, so the disabled state couldn't propagate.

I've added a getter for the full format that respects the feature flag, so that the caller will now be able to really optimize out the disabled backtrace path. I've also made rust_backtrace_env trivially inlineable when backtraces are disabled.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @kennytm

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 17, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 19, 2022

📌 Commit c280752 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 19, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89747 (Add MaybeUninit::(slice_)as_bytes(_mut))
 - rust-lang#89764 (Fix variant index / discriminant confusion in uninhabited enum branching)
 - rust-lang#91606 (Stabilize `-Z print-link-args` as `--print link-args`)
 - rust-lang#91694 (rustdoc: decouple stability and const-stability)
 - rust-lang#92183 (Point at correct argument when async fn output type lifetime disagrees with signature)
 - rust-lang#92582 (improve `_` constants in item signature handling)
 - rust-lang#92680 (intra-doc: Use the impl's assoc item where possible)
 - rust-lang#92704 (Change lint message to be stronger for &T -> &mut T transmute)
 - rust-lang#92861 (Rustdoc mobile: put out-of-band info on its own line)
 - rust-lang#92992 (Help optimize out backtraces when disabled)
 - rust-lang#93038 (Fix star handling in block doc comments)
 - rust-lang#93108 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
 - rust-lang#93112 (Fix CVE-2022-21658)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1cb57e2 into rust-lang:master Jan 20, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Jan 20, 2022
@kornelski kornelski deleted the backtraceopt branch January 20, 2022 23:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants