Rollup of 5 pull requests #98058
Closed
Rollup of 5 pull requests #98058
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Adds some additional crates used by Creusot.
issues97981
Add WIP stable MIR crate r? `@pnkfelix` Discussion about this happend in the SMIR meeting yesterday. Some info can be found at https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/320896-project-stable-mir/topic/dev.20plan.20mtg/near/283774691
[RFC 2011] Minimal initial implementation Tracking issue: rust-lang#44838 Third step of rust-lang#96496 Implementation has ~290 LOC with the bare minimum to be in a functional state. Currently only searches for binary operations to mimic what `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!` already do. r? `@oli-obk`
interpret: unify offset_from check with offset check `offset` does the check with a single `check_ptr_access` call while `offset_from` used two calls. Make them both just one one call. I originally intended to actually factor this into a common function, but I am no longer sure if that makes a lot of sense... the two functions start with pretty different precondition (e.g. `offset` *knows* that the 2nd pointer has the same provenance). I also reworded the UB messages a little. Saying it "cannot" do something is not how we usually phrase UB (as far as I know). Instead it's not *allowed* to do that. r? ````@oli-obk````
…_update_is_probably_complete, r=oli-obk Make `type_changing_struct_update` no longer an incomplete feature After rust-lang#97705, I don't see what would make it incomplete anymore. `check_expr_struct_fields` seems to now implement the RFC to the letter. r? ````@nikomatsakis```` cc ````@rust-lang/types````
[issues:97981] del unrelated comment fixes rust-lang#97981 summary: del unrelated comment
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
|
📌 Commit a5f53d4 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
gonna leave this open in case #98060 fails for now |
|
⌛ Testing commit a5f53d4 with merge 69e89b7077936fae618043a14a2051ce1265c9a9... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
type_changing_struct_updateno longer an incomplete feature #97999 (Maketype_changing_struct_updateno longer an incomplete feature)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup