Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs fixes #1143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2023
Merged

Docs fixes #1143

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2023

Conversation

helixbass
Copy link
Contributor

This PR just includes a couple small fixes (typos/grammar/etc) that I noticed as I was reading the wasm-pack docs

@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ wasm-pack build --target nodejs

## Scope

The init command also accepts an optional `--scope` argument. This will scope
The `build` command also accepts an optional `--scope` argument. This will scope
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't test that you can actually pass --scope to wasm-pack build but this would seem to be the correct change here (to be symmetrical with other stuff on this page and to match the example command below)

@@ -12,14 +12,14 @@ You'll also want to check out the contributing [guidelines].

## 🏃‍♀️ Up and Running

1. fork and clone this repository
1. fork and clone the `rustwasm/wasm-pack` repository
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When reading at https://rustwasm.github.io/docs/wasm-pack/ it wasn't self-evident what "this repository" was

Copy link
Member

@drager drager left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@drager drager merged commit 5a59df0 into rustwasm:master Jan 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants