feat: move to hatchling

[henryiii]

Moving over to using hatchling.

[eduardo-rodrigues]

I have to go and will look into this later ... As a general comment - it would make sense to me to first discuss changes/moves such as this one among us prior to being exposed to the fact. I can't see a counter argument. Kindly have this in mind in the future.

It goes without saying that I'm never against improvements. Would be worried about disruptions, in the broad sense, though. This seems welcome but allow me time to look ...

[henryiii]

Sorry, this has been happening across other Scikit-HEP repos, like scikit-hep/uproot5#688, scikit-hep/hist#418, and scikit-hep/vector#223. Didn't know it would need further discussion here. I'm interested in moving all of our pure Python packages over.

[henryiii]

And have no idea why Actions isn't running anything ATM. Edit: okay, finally ran.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 90.36% // Head: 90.78% // Increases project coverage by +0.41% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (da0950b) compared to base (0e651a4).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #423      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.36%   90.78%   +0.41%     
==========================================
  Files          29       29              
  Lines        1329     1324       -5     
==========================================
+ Hits         1201     1202       +1     
+ Misses        128      122       -6     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/particle/pdgid/functions.py	87.17% <0.00%> (ø)
src/particle/particle/particle.py	91.58% <0.00%> (+0.91%)	⬆️
src/particle/converters/bimap.py	91.20% <0.00%> (+1.84%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[eduardo-rodrigues]

I'm unfamiliar with hatchling but seems fine from reading changes themselves. It's kind of self-explanatory.

No more need for the MANIFEST file?

[henryiii]

That’s a setuptools thing. The SDist will have a bit more in it, but that’s fine. The wheel should be just like before. Hatchling uses the .gitignore file to decide what to include. You can manually add config to the pyproject file to exclude or add files, but it does a good job by default.