Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix missing types and jsDocs #89

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
May 12, 2024
Merged

fix missing types and jsDocs #89

merged 17 commits into from
May 12, 2024

Conversation

erikyo
Copy link
Collaborator

@erikyo erikyo commented May 5, 2024

This pull request addresses the need for consistent documentation within the repository by adding JSDoc comments where they were previously missing.

This enhances code readability and maintainability.

Each file has been reviewed and updated as necessary to ensure comprehensive documentation coverage.

@erikyo erikyo mentioned this pull request May 5, 2024
10 tasks
@erikyo erikyo marked this pull request as draft May 5, 2024 22:37
@erikyo erikyo mentioned this pull request May 6, 2024
@erikyo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

erikyo commented May 8, 2024

the last commit was required to show the IDE tooltip / suggestion in the right way (tested vscode and webstorm). replaced the default export with named export for Po* singleton

ide

@erikyo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

erikyo commented May 10, 2024

I enabled strict types and fails

cc. @johnhooks

Copy link

@johnhooks johnhooks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@erikyo looking good, my overall suggestion is to only attempt adding the initial set of types, not fixing logical or type errors. It would be nice to do those one at a time in separate PRs so they can get the attention they deserve.

src/mocompiler.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/mocompiler.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 45 to 46
* @param {import('./types.js').GetTextTranslations['translations']} translations
* @return {import('./types.js').GetTextTranslations['translations']}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you use the suggestion above, I would also declare the Translations type like this:

// At the top of the file with the other type import. We can use `GetTextTranslations` directly because it's already imported.
/**
 * @param {GetTextTranslations['translations']} Translations
 */
Suggested change
* @param {import('./types.js').GetTextTranslations['translations']} translations
* @return {import('./types.js').GetTextTranslations['translations']}
* @param {Translations} translations
* @return {Translations}

I haven't checked, though if Translations could be typed separately, rather than looking it up with key access on GetTextTranslations, that would be preferred. If that is acceptable then it would change to:

// At the top of the file with the other type import. We can use `GetTextTranslations` directly because it's already imported.
/**
 * @typedef {import('./types.js').Translations) Translations
 */

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes be patient but that is the fastest way with my IDE to generate jsdocs types. a 'cleaner' commit will follow all these changes

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i just give a try and seems that jsDocs only supports inline import :/

image

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks to me like you didn't import them. Is it okay for me to PR this branch so you can see what I mean?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure! I think you have even permission to edit my repo, if not tell me

src/mocompiler.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/mocompiler.js Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pocompiler.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pocompiler.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pocompiler.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/shared.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
* @property {number} [foldLength] the fold length.
* @property {boolean} [escapeCharacters] Whether to escape characters.
* @property {boolean} [sort] Whether to sort messages.
* @property {string} [eol] End of line character.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would declare all the types in a types.ts file, I think that is pretty standard practice when using JSDocs.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i would suggest a PR after this one that stabilizes imports and sorting for jsDocs. in this one I would feel satisfied if I can reduce the errors to zero :😇

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

however, I do not know if it is a good practice or not to create a '.ts' for declarations, but I think there would be problems with running tests for example, it would force one to use tsnode to execute the suite


this._translations = [];

this._writeFunc = 'writeUInt32LE';

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this be removed?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That assignment appears to have been established at some point, presumably intended for modification through options. However, with no implementation efforts undertaken, it remains as unused memory.

https://nodejs.org/api/buffer.html#bufwriteuint32levalue-offset

These serve as the 'placeholders' for the associated function name utilized for reading bytes from the po/mo files. Frankly, I'm uncertain whether it's worthwhile to implement the others, as file writing should adhere to a similar approach.

this made typing more complicated, what do you say I leave it or is it OK?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would argue that byte order should be an option of the compiler, so rather than remove the concept of changing the write function we should fix it.

If a mo file is parsed in a specific byte order it should be rewritten in the same order.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be an option of the compiler

i think this requires a separate issue. won't fix in this pr

src/mocompiler.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
erikyo and others added 2 commits May 11, 2024 16:47
Co-authored-by: John Hooks <bitmachina@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: John Hooks <bitmachina@outlook.com>
@erikyo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

erikyo commented May 11, 2024

will apply the suggestion asap... thank you John! Anyhow check this:

https://github.com/smhg/gettext-parser/pull/89/checks

there are only about 30 type errors left 🚀 then we are good to go

@erikyo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

erikyo commented May 11, 2024

The remaining types I sincerely believe require something structural that cannot be done in this pr.

I am referring for example to these which should be classes (

util.inherits(PoParserTransform, Transform);
) which has to extend the base class to inherit the types or objects which have the same keys (ie the translation) but they have been used for different ways creating some confusion in the type to be used

what do you think @johnhooks? should I disable the type checking in order to pass again the tests so then we can focus on the last 20-30 issues?

@erikyo erikyo requested a review from johnhooks May 11, 2024 23:18
@johnhooks
Copy link

@erikyo I think it's fair to set continue-on-error: true on the tsc GitHub action step, and accept that it fails. There might also be other ways to indicate a step as an optional part of the job.

@erikyo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

erikyo commented May 12, 2024

in this case we should split the CI actions into 2 different steps because otherwise it will allow the tests to fail

@erikyo erikyo force-pushed the jsDocs-fix branch 3 times, most recently from 42498d6 to 981551b Compare May 12, 2024 00:27
@erikyo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

erikyo commented May 12, 2024

fixed, and fixed the reporter in the code tab (previously was duplicated)

johnhooks and others added 6 commits May 11, 2024 22:14
This commit adds missing types and attempts fix type errors.

There are still a few type errors, though how to fix them is not clear.
Adds the `Translations` type for the `translations` property of the
`GetTextTranslations` type.
fix: adjust typing of the parsers and compilers
@erikyo erikyo marked this pull request as ready for review May 12, 2024 19:01
@erikyo erikyo merged commit c40a44c into smhg:development May 12, 2024
5 checks passed
Copy link

@johnhooks johnhooks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great @erikyo, very exciting to get the type errors resolved and have the declarations output for exporting first party types.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants