Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Q objects with negation #49

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2017
Merged

Conversation

stphivos
Copy link
Owner

@stphivos stphivos commented May 8, 2017

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 8, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #49 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master    #49   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files           6      6           
  Lines         698    702    +4     
=====================================
+ Hits          698    702    +4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
django_mock_queries/utils.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
django_mock_queries/query.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6da61e0...f6ae8b1. Read the comment docs.

@stphivos stphivos merged commit 830bd7c into master May 8, 2017
@stphivos stphivos mentioned this pull request May 8, 2017
@stphivos stphivos deleted the feature/qobj_negation branch May 8, 2017 22:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants