feat(cdk): add TuiRepeatTimes pipe

[splincode]

@waterplea I want to use @for in Angular 18 and I don't want use *tuiRepeatTimes

I can happy with it

• strict types

[lumberjack-bot]

Pull request was closed ✔️

All saved screenshots (for current PR) were deleted 🗑️

[github-actions]

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit 98b627f):

https://taiga-previews--pr9262-splincode-feat-repea-s39bz7vq.web.app

_{(expires Tue, 01 Oct 2024 08:15:46 GMT)}

_{🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎}

_{Sign: 20bbff1ad19772ecf9c5134a84c0641b0d776f4a}

[bundlemon]

BundleMon

Files updated (2)

Status	Path	Size	Limits
✅	demo/browser/main.(hash).js	288.09KB (+116B +0.04%)	+10%
✅	demo/browser/runtime.(hash).js	42.8KB (+86B +0.2%)	+10%

Unchanged files (3)

Status	Path	Size	Limits
✅	demo/browser/vendor.(hash).js	247.14KB	+10%
✅	demo/browser/styles.(hash).css	16.17KB	+10%
✅	demo/browser/polyfills.(hash).js	11.18KB	+10%

Total files change +202B +0.03%

Groups updated (1)

Status	Path	Size	Limits
✅	demo/browser/*..js	7.18MB (+41.79KB +0.57%)	-

Final result: ✅

View report in BundleMon website ➡️

---

Current branch size history | Target branch size history

[waterplea]

Cool idea. Do we really need those excessive types, though?

[splincode]

need those excessive types,

It helps with some clamp case

// @ts-expect-error
expect(pipe.transform(-1)).toEqual([]);

https://catchts.com/range-numbers

[splincode]

In the future TypeScript will add a range type to standard library, I think
microsoft/TypeScript#54925

[waterplea]

need those excessive types,

It helps with some clamp case

// @ts-expect-error
expect(pipe.transform(-1)).toEqual([]);

https://catchts.com/range-numbers

But it's a pipe, are there any benefits for it though? Seems like it's a lot of added complexity for little to no benefit.

[splincode]

But it's a pipe, are there any benefits for it though? Seems like it's a lot of added complexity for little to no benefit.

[splincode]

@waterplea
Okey, I will drop types