Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Clarify redacted m.room.member events
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
tcpipuk authored Sep 30, 2024
1 parent 23a3a62 commit f32932c
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 3 deletions.
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions proposals/4133-extended-profiles.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -284,9 +284,10 @@ Until a future MSC specifies otherwise:
users in the current room, any users sharing a room with this user, all users globally) with
defaults sensitive to their implementation's UI and intended audience. This proposal *recommends*
clients only display profiles of users in the current room whose membership status is `join`,
`invite`, or `knock`, and that if custom fields are always available in the UI, an option should
be provided to hide/minimise them automatically. These recommendations are to moderation concerns
associated with displaying information from banned or departed users.
`invite`, or `knock`, and whose `m.room.member` event has *not* been redacted. If a client offers
an option for custom fields to always be available in the UI, an option should be provided to
hide/minimise them automatically. These recommendations are to moderation concerns associated
with displaying information from banned or departed users.

- Clients should provide a UI for users to enter their own free-text custom fields in the `u.*`
namespace of their own profile.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit f32932c

Please sign in to comment.