Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests/e2e: fix skipRootUserTests flag 🎏 #2304

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2020

Conversation

vdemeester
Copy link
Member

Changes

Before this fix, the flag doesn't set the variable as it might never
be parsed.

  • mark the flag as boolean
  • flag.parse in TestMain to make sure it is parsed

Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester vdemeest@redhat.com

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

tests/e2e: fix skipRootUserTests.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit label Mar 30, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 30, 2020
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/area testing

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the area/testing Issues or PRs related to testing label Mar 30, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 30, 2020
Before this fix, the flag doesn't set the variable as it might never
be parsed.

- mark the flag as boolean
- flag.parse in `TestMain` to make sure it is parsed

Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vdemeest@redhat.com>
@piyush-garg
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 30, 2020
@ghost ghost added the needs-cherry-pick Indicates a PR needs to be cherry-pick to a release branch label Mar 30, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbwsg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 30, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 8a9036b into tektoncd:master Mar 30, 2020
@vdemeester vdemeester deleted the fix-skip-test-flag branch March 30, 2020 13:58
@ghost ghost removed the needs-cherry-pick Indicates a PR needs to be cherry-pick to a release branch label Mar 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/testing Issues or PRs related to testing cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants