fixed return value #316

Lavender204 · 2016-08-31T13:59:08Z

Fixed return value...
selinux_enabled to "selinux_is_enabled"

Fixed return value... selinux_enabled to "selinux_is_enabled"

lenovouser · 2016-09-02T20:45:56Z

@RichVillage

This repo is mirror-only - nothing will be accepted here for legitimate reasons. Please see:

I don't do github pull requests.

github throws away all the relevant information, like having even a
valid email address for the person asking me to pull. The diffstat is
also deficient and useless.

Git comes with a nice pull-request generation module, but github
instead decided to replace it with their own totally inferior version.
As a result, I consider github useless for these kinds of things. It's
fine for hosting, but the pull requests and the online commit
editing, are just pure garbage.

I've told github people about my concerns, they didn't think they
mattered, so I gave up. Feel free to make a bugreport to github.

Linus

Lavender204 · 2016-09-04T05:09:29Z

@lenovouser Oh, I see. Thanks for replying, and have a nice day!

lenovouser · 2016-09-04T17:59:36Z

@RichVillage no problem, have a nice day too!

lkl: add LKL_HIJACK_BOOT_CMDLINE option to configure boot cmdline

Eric report a oops when booting the system after applying the commit a99b646 ("PCI: Disable PCIe Relaxed..."): [ 4.241029] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000050 [ 4.247001] IP: pci_find_pcie_root_port+0x62/0x80 [ 4.253011] PGD 0 [ 4.253011] P4D 0 [ 4.253011] [ 4.258013] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 4.262015] Modules linked in: [ 4.265005] CPU: 31 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.13.0-dbx-DEV #316 [ 4.271002] Hardware name: Intel RML,PCH/Iota_QC_19, BIOS 2.40.0 06/22/2016 [ 4.279002] task: ffffa2ee38cfa040 task.stack: ffffa51ec0004000 [ 4.285001] RIP: 0010:pci_find_pcie_root_port+0x62/0x80 [ 4.290012] RSP: 0000:ffffa51ec0007ab8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 4.295003] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa2ee36bae000 RCX: 0000000000000006 [ 4.303002] RDX: 000000000000081c RSI: ffffa2ee38cfa8c8 RDI: ffffa2ee36bae000 [ 4.310013] RBP: ffffa51ec0007b58 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 4.317001] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa51ec0007ad0 [ 4.324005] R13: ffffa2ee36bae098 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: ffffa2ee37204818 [ 4.331002] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa2ee3fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 4.339002] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 4.345001] CR2: 0000000000000050 CR3: 000000401000f000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 [ 4.351002] Call Trace: [ 4.354012] ? pci_configure_device+0x19f/0x570 [ 4.359002] ? pci_conf1_read+0xb8/0xf0 [ 4.363002] ? raw_pci_read+0x23/0x40 [ 4.366011] ? pci_read+0x2c/0x30 [ 4.370014] ? pci_read_config_word+0x67/0x70 [ 4.374012] pci_device_add+0x28/0x230 [ 4.378012] ? pci_vpd_f0_read+0x50/0x80 [ 4.382014] pci_scan_single_device+0x96/0xc0 [ 4.386012] pci_scan_slot+0x79/0xf0 [ 4.389001] pci_scan_child_bus+0x31/0x180 [ 4.394014] acpi_pci_root_create+0x1c6/0x240 [ 4.398013] pci_acpi_scan_root+0x15f/0x1b0 [ 4.402012] acpi_pci_root_add+0x2e6/0x400 [ 4.406012] ? acpi_evaluate_integer+0x37/0x60 [ 4.411002] acpi_bus_attach+0xdf/0x200 [ 4.415002] acpi_bus_attach+0x6a/0x200 [ 4.418014] acpi_bus_attach+0x6a/0x200 [ 4.422013] acpi_bus_scan+0x38/0x70 [ 4.426011] acpi_scan_init+0x10c/0x271 [ 4.429001] acpi_init+0x2fa/0x348 [ 4.433004] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x2d/0x2d [ 4.437001] do_one_initcall+0x43/0x169 [ 4.441001] kernel_init_freeable+0x1d0/0x258 [ 4.445003] ? rest_init+0xe0/0xe0 [ 4.449001] kernel_init+0xe/0x150 ====================== cut here ============================= It looks like the pci_find_pcie_root_port() was trying to find the Root Port for the PCI device which is the Root Port already, it will return NULL and trigger the problem, so check the highest_pcie_bridge to fix thie problem. Fixes: a99b646 ("PCI: Disable PCIe Relaxed Ordering if unsupported") Fixes: c56d445 ("PCI: Turn off Request Attributes to avoid Chelsio T5 Completion erratum") Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Eric report a oops when booting the system after applying the commit a99b646 ("PCI: Disable PCIe Relaxed..."): [ 4.241029] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000050 [ 4.247001] IP: pci_find_pcie_root_port+0x62/0x80 [ 4.253011] PGD 0 [ 4.253011] P4D 0 [ 4.253011] [ 4.258013] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 4.262015] Modules linked in: [ 4.265005] CPU: 31 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.13.0-dbx-DEV torvalds#316 [ 4.271002] Hardware name: Intel RML,PCH/Iota_QC_19, BIOS 2.40.0 06/22/2016 [ 4.279002] task: ffffa2ee38cfa040 task.stack: ffffa51ec0004000 [ 4.285001] RIP: 0010:pci_find_pcie_root_port+0x62/0x80 [ 4.290012] RSP: 0000:ffffa51ec0007ab8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 4.295003] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa2ee36bae000 RCX: 0000000000000006 [ 4.303002] RDX: 000000000000081c RSI: ffffa2ee38cfa8c8 RDI: ffffa2ee36bae000 [ 4.310013] RBP: ffffa51ec0007b58 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 4.317001] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa51ec0007ad0 [ 4.324005] R13: ffffa2ee36bae098 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: ffffa2ee37204818 [ 4.331002] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa2ee3fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 4.339002] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 4.345001] CR2: 0000000000000050 CR3: 000000401000f000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 [ 4.351002] Call Trace: [ 4.354012] ? pci_configure_device+0x19f/0x570 [ 4.359002] ? pci_conf1_read+0xb8/0xf0 [ 4.363002] ? raw_pci_read+0x23/0x40 [ 4.366011] ? pci_read+0x2c/0x30 [ 4.370014] ? pci_read_config_word+0x67/0x70 [ 4.374012] pci_device_add+0x28/0x230 [ 4.378012] ? pci_vpd_f0_read+0x50/0x80 [ 4.382014] pci_scan_single_device+0x96/0xc0 [ 4.386012] pci_scan_slot+0x79/0xf0 [ 4.389001] pci_scan_child_bus+0x31/0x180 [ 4.394014] acpi_pci_root_create+0x1c6/0x240 [ 4.398013] pci_acpi_scan_root+0x15f/0x1b0 [ 4.402012] acpi_pci_root_add+0x2e6/0x400 [ 4.406012] ? acpi_evaluate_integer+0x37/0x60 [ 4.411002] acpi_bus_attach+0xdf/0x200 [ 4.415002] acpi_bus_attach+0x6a/0x200 [ 4.418014] acpi_bus_attach+0x6a/0x200 [ 4.422013] acpi_bus_scan+0x38/0x70 [ 4.426011] acpi_scan_init+0x10c/0x271 [ 4.429001] acpi_init+0x2fa/0x348 [ 4.433004] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x2d/0x2d [ 4.437001] do_one_initcall+0x43/0x169 [ 4.441001] kernel_init_freeable+0x1d0/0x258 [ 4.445003] ? rest_init+0xe0/0xe0 [ 4.449001] kernel_init+0xe/0x150 ====================== cut here ============================= It looks like the pci_find_pcie_root_port() was trying to find the Root Port for the PCI device which is the Root Port already, it will return NULL and trigger the problem, so check the highest_pcie_bridge to fix thie problem. Fixes: a99b646 ("PCI: Disable PCIe Relaxed Ordering if unsupported") Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>

With latest kernel I get below bug while testing kdump: [ 0.000000] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] IP: zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 [ 0.000000] PGD 37b98067 P4D 37b98067 PUD 37b97067 PMD 0 [ 0.000000] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ torvalds#316 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ARS1BJ02/20ARS1BJ02, BIOS GJET92WW (2.42 ) 03/03/2017 [ 0.000000] task: ffffffff81a0e4c0 task.stack: ffffffff81a00000 [ 0.000000] RIP: 0010:zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 [ 0.000000] RSP: 0000:ffffffff81a03d88 EFLAGS: 00010006 [ 0.000000] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffea00034b1040 RCX: 0000000000000010 [ 0.000000] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI: ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] RBP: 00000000000d2c41 R08: 00000000000000c0 R09: 0000000000000a0d [ 0.000000] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000007f01 R12: ffffffff81a03d90 [ 0.000000] R13: ffffea0000000000 R14: 0000000000000063 R15: 0000000000000062 [ 0.000000] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff81c73000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 0.000000] CR2: ffffea00034b1040 CR3: 0000000037609000 CR4: 00000000000606b0 [ 0.000000] Call Trace: [ 0.000000] ? free_area_init_nodes+0x640/0x664 [ 0.000000] ? zone_sizes_init+0x58/0x72 [ 0.000000] ? setup_arch+0xb50/0xc6c [ 0.000000] ? start_kernel+0x64/0x43d [ 0.000000] ? secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 [ 0.000000] Code: c1 e8 0c 48 39 d8 76 27 48 89 de 48 c1 e3 06 48 c7 c7 7a 87 79 81 e8 b0 c0 3e ff 4c 01 eb b9 10 00 00 00 31 c0 48 89 df 49 ff c6 <f3> ab eb bc 6a 00 49 c7 c0 f0 93 d1 81 31 d2 83 ce ff 41 54 49 [ 0.000000] RIP: zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 RSP: ffffffff81a03d88 [ 0.000000] CR2: ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace f5ba9e8f73c7ee26 ]--- This is introduced by a4a3ede ("mm: zero reserved and unavailable struct pages"). The reason is some efi reserved boot ranges is not reported in E820 ram. In my case it is a bgrt buffer: efi: mem00: [Boot Data |RUN| | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x00000000d2c41000-0x00000000d2c85fff] (0MB) Use "add_efi_memmap" can workaround the problem with another fix: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171130052327.GA3500@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com In zero_resv_unavail it would be better to check pfn_valid first before zero the page struct. This fixes the problem and potential other similar problems. Also as Pavel Tatashin suggested checks pfn_valid at the beginning of the section. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171201095048.GA3084@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com Fixes: a4a3ede ("mm: zero reserved and unavailable struct pages") Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

With latest kernel I get below bug while testing kdump: [ 0.000000] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] IP: zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 [ 0.000000] PGD 37b98067 P4D 37b98067 PUD 37b97067 PMD 0 [ 0.000000] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ torvalds#316 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ARS1BJ02/20ARS1BJ02, BIOS GJET92WW (2.42 ) 03/03/2017 [ 0.000000] task: ffffffff81a0e4c0 task.stack: ffffffff81a00000 [ 0.000000] RIP: 0010:zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 [ 0.000000] RSP: 0000:ffffffff81a03d88 EFLAGS: 00010006 [ 0.000000] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffea00034b1040 RCX: 0000000000000010 [ 0.000000] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI: ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] RBP: 00000000000d2c41 R08: 00000000000000c0 R09: 0000000000000a0d [ 0.000000] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000007f01 R12: ffffffff81a03d90 [ 0.000000] R13: ffffea0000000000 R14: 0000000000000063 R15: 0000000000000062 [ 0.000000] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff81c73000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 0.000000] CR2: ffffea00034b1040 CR3: 0000000037609000 CR4: 00000000000606b0 [ 0.000000] Call Trace: [ 0.000000] ? free_area_init_nodes+0x640/0x664 [ 0.000000] ? zone_sizes_init+0x58/0x72 [ 0.000000] ? setup_arch+0xb50/0xc6c [ 0.000000] ? start_kernel+0x64/0x43d [ 0.000000] ? secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 [ 0.000000] Code: c1 e8 0c 48 39 d8 76 27 48 89 de 48 c1 e3 06 48 c7 c7 7a 87 79 81 e8 b0 c0 3e ff 4c 01 eb b9 10 00 00 00 31 c0 48 89 df 49 ff c6 <f3> ab eb bc 6a 00 49 c7 c0 f0 93 d1 81 31 d2 83 ce ff 41 54 49 [ 0.000000] RIP: zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 RSP: ffffffff81a03d88 [ 0.000000] CR2: ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace f5ba9e8f73c7ee26 ]--- This is introduced by a4a3ede ("mm: zero reserved and unavailable struct pages"). The reason is some efi reserved boot ranges is not reported in E820 ram. In my case it is a bgrt buffer: efi: mem00: [Boot Data |RUN| | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x00000000d2c41000-0x00000000d2c85fff] (0MB) Use "add_efi_memmap" can workaround the problem with another fix: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171130052327.GA3500@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com In zero_resv_unavail it would be better to check pfn_valid first before zero the page struct. This fixes the problem and potential other similar problems. Also as Pavel Tatashin suggested checks pfn_valid at the beginning of the section. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171201095048.GA3084@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com Fixes: a4a3ede ("mm: zero reserved and unavailable struct pages") Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

With latest kernel I get below bug while testing kdump: [ 0.000000] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] IP: zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 [ 0.000000] PGD 37b98067 P4D 37b98067 PUD 37b97067 PMD 0 [ 0.000000] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ torvalds#316 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ARS1BJ02/20ARS1BJ02, BIOS GJET92WW (2.42 ) 03/03/2017 [ 0.000000] task: ffffffff81a0e4c0 task.stack: ffffffff81a00000 [ 0.000000] RIP: 0010:zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 [ 0.000000] RSP: 0000:ffffffff81a03d88 EFLAGS: 00010006 [ 0.000000] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffea00034b1040 RCX: 0000000000000010 [ 0.000000] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI: ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] RBP: 00000000000d2c41 R08: 00000000000000c0 R09: 0000000000000a0d [ 0.000000] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000007f01 R12: ffffffff81a03d90 [ 0.000000] R13: ffffea0000000000 R14: 0000000000000063 R15: 0000000000000062 [ 0.000000] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff81c73000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 0.000000] CR2: ffffea00034b1040 CR3: 0000000037609000 CR4: 00000000000606b0 [ 0.000000] Call Trace: [ 0.000000] ? free_area_init_nodes+0x640/0x664 [ 0.000000] ? zone_sizes_init+0x58/0x72 [ 0.000000] ? setup_arch+0xb50/0xc6c [ 0.000000] ? start_kernel+0x64/0x43d [ 0.000000] ? secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 [ 0.000000] Code: c1 e8 0c 48 39 d8 76 27 48 89 de 48 c1 e3 06 48 c7 c7 7a 87 79 81 e8 b0 c0 3e ff 4c 01 eb b9 10 00 00 00 31 c0 48 89 df 49 ff c6 <f3> ab eb bc 6a 00 49 c7 c0 f0 93 d1 81 31 d2 83 ce ff 41 54 49 [ 0.000000] RIP: zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 RSP: ffffffff81a03d88 [ 0.000000] CR2: ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace f5ba9e8f73c7ee26 ]--- This is introduced by a4a3ede ("mm: zero reserved and unavailable struct pages"). The reason is some efi reserved boot ranges is not reported in E820 ram. In my case it is a bgrt buffer: efi: mem00: [Boot Data |RUN| | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x00000000d2c41000-0x00000000d2c85fff] (0MB) Use "add_efi_memmap" can workaround the problem with another fix: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171130052327.GA3500@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com In zero_resv_unavail it would be better to check pfn_valid first before zero the page struct. This fixes the problem and potential other similar problems. Also as Pavel Tatashin suggested checks pfn_valid at the beginning of the section. The range is backed by real memory. The memory range is efi "Boot Service Data", that means after ExitBootServices() these ranges can be used as system ram. But some of them need to be reserved, for example the bgrt image address in an acpi table, if the image memory is freed then kexec reboot will fail because kexec inherit same acpi table to initialize the driver. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171201095048.GA3084@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com Fixes: a4a3ede ("mm: zero reserved and unavailable struct pages") Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

With latest kernel I get below bug while testing kdump: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffea00034b1040 IP: zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 PGD 37b98067 P4D 37b98067 PUD 37b97067 PMD 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #316 Hardware name: LENOVO 20ARS1BJ02/20ARS1BJ02, BIOS GJET92WW (2.42 ) 03/03/2017 task: ffffffff81a0e4c0 task.stack: ffffffff81a00000 RIP: 0010:zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 RSP: 0000:ffffffff81a03d88 EFLAGS: 00010006 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffea00034b1040 RCX: 0000000000000010 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI: ffffea00034b1040 RBP: 00000000000d2c41 R08: 00000000000000c0 R09: 0000000000000a0d R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000007f01 R12: ffffffff81a03d90 R13: ffffea0000000000 R14: 0000000000000063 R15: 0000000000000062 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff81c73000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffea00034b1040 CR3: 0000000037609000 CR4: 00000000000606b0 Call Trace: ? free_area_init_nodes+0x640/0x664 ? zone_sizes_init+0x58/0x72 ? setup_arch+0xb50/0xc6c ? start_kernel+0x64/0x43d ? secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 Code: c1 e8 0c 48 39 d8 76 27 48 89 de 48 c1 e3 06 48 c7 c7 7a 87 79 81 e8 b0 c0 3e ff 4c 01 eb b9 10 00 00 00 31 c0 48 89 df 49 ff c6 <f3> ab eb bc 6a 00 49 c7 c0 f0 93 d1 81 31 d2 83 ce ff 41 54 49 RIP: zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 RSP: ffffffff81a03d88 CR2: ffffea00034b1040 ---[ end trace f5ba9e8f73c7ee26 ]--- This is introduced by commit a4a3ede ("mm: zero reserved and unavailable struct pages"). The reason is some efi reserved boot ranges is not reported in E820 ram. In my case it is a bgrt buffer: efi: mem00: [Boot Data |RUN| | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x00000000d2c41000-0x00000000d2c85fff] (0MB) Use "add_efi_memmap" can workaround the problem with another fix: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171130052327.GA3500@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com In zero_resv_unavail it would be better to check pfn_valid first before zero the page struct. This fixes the problem and potential other similar problems. Also as Pavel Tatashin suggested checks pfn_valid at the beginning of the section. The range is backed by real memory. The memory range is efi "Boot Service Data", that means after ExitBootServices() these ranges can be used as system ram. But some of them need to be reserved, for example the bgrt image address in an acpi table, if the image memory is freed then kexec reboot will fail because kexec inherit same acpi table to initialize the driver. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171201095048.GA3084@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com Fixes: a4a3ede ("mm: zero reserved and unavailable struct pages") Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

With latest kernel I get below bug while testing kdump: [ 0.000000] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] IP: zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 [ 0.000000] PGD 37b98067 P4D 37b98067 PUD 37b97067 PMD 0 [ 0.000000] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ torvalds#316 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ARS1BJ02/20ARS1BJ02, BIOS GJET92WW (2.42 ) 03/03/2017 [ 0.000000] task: ffffffff81a0e4c0 task.stack: ffffffff81a00000 [ 0.000000] RIP: 0010:zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 [ 0.000000] RSP: 0000:ffffffff81a03d88 EFLAGS: 00010006 [ 0.000000] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffea00034b1040 RCX: 0000000000000010 [ 0.000000] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI: ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] RBP: 00000000000d2c41 R08: 00000000000000c0 R09: 0000000000000a0d [ 0.000000] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000007f01 R12: ffffffff81a03d90 [ 0.000000] R13: ffffea0000000000 R14: 0000000000000063 R15: 0000000000000062 [ 0.000000] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff81c73000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 0.000000] CR2: ffffea00034b1040 CR3: 0000000037609000 CR4: 00000000000606b0 [ 0.000000] Call Trace: [ 0.000000] ? free_area_init_nodes+0x640/0x664 [ 0.000000] ? zone_sizes_init+0x58/0x72 [ 0.000000] ? setup_arch+0xb50/0xc6c [ 0.000000] ? start_kernel+0x64/0x43d [ 0.000000] ? secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 [ 0.000000] Code: c1 e8 0c 48 39 d8 76 27 48 89 de 48 c1 e3 06 48 c7 c7 7a 87 79 81 e8 b0 c0 3e ff 4c 01 eb b9 10 00 00 00 31 c0 48 89 df 49 ff c6 <f3> ab eb bc 6a 00 49 c7 c0 f0 93 d1 81 31 d2 83 ce ff 41 54 49 [ 0.000000] RIP: zero_resv_unavail+0xbd/0x126 RSP: ffffffff81a03d88 [ 0.000000] CR2: ffffea00034b1040 [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace f5ba9e8f73c7ee26 ]--- This is introduced by a4a3ede ("mm: zero reserved and unavailable struct pages"). The reason is some efi reserved boot ranges is not reported in E820 ram. In my case it is a bgrt buffer: efi: mem00: [Boot Data |RUN| | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x00000000d2c41000-0x00000000d2c85fff] (0MB) Use "add_efi_memmap" can workaround the problem with another fix: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171130052327.GA3500@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com In zero_resv_unavail it would be better to check pfn_valid first before zero the page struct. This fixes the problem and potential other similar problems. Also as Pavel Tatashin suggested checks pfn_valid at the beginning of the section. The range is backed by real memory. The memory range is efi "Boot Service Data", that means after ExitBootServices() these ranges can be used as system ram. But some of them need to be reserved, for example the bgrt image address in an acpi table, if the image memory is freed then kexec reboot will fail because kexec inherit same acpi table to initialize the driver. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171201095048.GA3084@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com Fixes: a4a3ede ("mm: zero reserved and unavailable struct pages") Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

If a macro is in CamelCase, it it converted to upper case. Variables and routine names are converted to lower case. The following checkpatch exceptions are also fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#316: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/fw.c:1751: + SET_8821AE_H2CCMD_AOAC_RSVDPAGE_LOC_GTK_EXT_MEM(u1rsvdpageloc2, GTKEXT_PG); CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV) torvalds#357: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2591: + (eeaddr+1), hwinfo[eeaddr+1]); ^ CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV) torvalds#357: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2591: + (eeaddr+1), hwinfo[eeaddr+1]); ^ CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV) torvalds#358: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2592: + if (0xFF == hwinfo[eeaddr+1]) /*YJ,add,120316*/ ^ WARNING: Comparisons should place the constant on the right side of the test torvalds#358: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2592: + if (0xFF == hwinfo[eeaddr+1]) /*YJ,add,120316*/ CHECK: spaces preferred around that '&' (ctx:VxV) torvalds#501: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2666: + pwrinfo24g->bw40_diff[rfpath][txcount] = (hwinfo[eeaddr]&0xf0) >> 4; ^ Note that not all checkpatch exceptions are addressed. Those will be handled in later patches. Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

If a macro is in CamelCase, it it converted to upper case. Variables and routine names are converted to lower case. The following checkpatch exceptions are also fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#316: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/fw.c:1751: + SET_8821AE_H2CCMD_AOAC_RSVDPAGE_LOC_GTK_EXT_MEM(u1rsvdpageloc2, GTKEXT_PG); CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV) torvalds#357: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2591: + (eeaddr+1), hwinfo[eeaddr+1]); ^ CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV) torvalds#357: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2591: + (eeaddr+1), hwinfo[eeaddr+1]); ^ CHECK: spaces preferred around that '+' (ctx:VxV) torvalds#358: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2592: + if (0xFF == hwinfo[eeaddr+1]) /*YJ,add,120316*/ ^ WARNING: Comparisons should place the constant on the right side of the test torvalds#358: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2592: + if (0xFF == hwinfo[eeaddr+1]) /*YJ,add,120316*/ CHECK: spaces preferred around that '&' (ctx:VxV) torvalds#501: FILE: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c:2666: + pwrinfo24g->bw40_diff[rfpath][txcount] = (hwinfo[eeaddr]&0xf0) >> 4; ^ Note that not all checkpatch exceptions are addressed. Those will be handled in later patches. Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>

With multipath enabled, nvme_scan_work() can read from the device (through nvme_mpath_add_disk()) and hang [1]. However, with fabrics, once ctrl->state is set to NVME_CTRL_DELETING, the reads will hang (see nvmf_check_ready()) and the mpath stack device make_request will block if head->list is not empty. However, when the head->list consistst of only DELETING/DEAD controllers, we should actually not block, but rather fail immediately. In addition, before we go ahead and remove the namespaces, make sure to clear the current path and kick the requeue list so that the request will fast fail upon requeuing. [1]: -- INFO: task kworker/u4:3:166 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6-vmlocalyes-00005-g808c8c2dc0cf #316 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. kworker/u4:3 D 0 166 2 0x80004000 Workqueue: nvme-wq nvme_scan_work Call Trace: __schedule+0x851/0x1400 schedule+0x99/0x210 io_schedule+0x21/0x70 do_read_cache_page+0xa57/0x1330 read_cache_page+0x4a/0x70 read_dev_sector+0xbf/0x380 amiga_partition+0xc4/0x1230 check_partition+0x30f/0x630 rescan_partitions+0x19a/0x980 __blkdev_get+0x85a/0x12f0 blkdev_get+0x2a5/0x790 __device_add_disk+0xe25/0x1250 device_add_disk+0x13/0x20 nvme_mpath_set_live+0x172/0x2b0 nvme_update_ns_ana_state+0x130/0x180 nvme_set_ns_ana_state+0x9a/0xb0 nvme_parse_ana_log+0x1c3/0x4a0 nvme_mpath_add_disk+0x157/0x290 nvme_validate_ns+0x1017/0x1bd0 nvme_scan_work+0x44d/0x6a0 process_one_work+0x7d7/0x1240 worker_thread+0x8e/0xff0 kthread+0x2c3/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 INFO: task kworker/u4:1:1034 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6-vmlocalyes-00005-g808c8c2dc0cf #316 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. kworker/u4:1 D 0 1034 2 0x80004000 Workqueue: nvme-delete-wq nvme_delete_ctrl_work Call Trace: __schedule+0x851/0x1400 schedule+0x99/0x210 schedule_timeout+0x390/0x830 wait_for_completion+0x1a7/0x310 __flush_work+0x241/0x5d0 flush_work+0x10/0x20 nvme_remove_namespaces+0x85/0x3d0 nvme_do_delete_ctrl+0xb4/0x1e0 nvme_delete_ctrl_work+0x15/0x20 process_one_work+0x7d7/0x1240 worker_thread+0x8e/0xff0 kthread+0x2c3/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 -- Reported-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Tested-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>

[ Upstream commit 0157ec8 ] With multipath enabled, nvme_scan_work() can read from the device (through nvme_mpath_add_disk()) and hang [1]. However, with fabrics, once ctrl->state is set to NVME_CTRL_DELETING, the reads will hang (see nvmf_check_ready()) and the mpath stack device make_request will block if head->list is not empty. However, when the head->list consistst of only DELETING/DEAD controllers, we should actually not block, but rather fail immediately. In addition, before we go ahead and remove the namespaces, make sure to clear the current path and kick the requeue list so that the request will fast fail upon requeuing. [1]: -- INFO: task kworker/u4:3:166 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6-vmlocalyes-00005-g808c8c2dc0cf #316 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. kworker/u4:3 D 0 166 2 0x80004000 Workqueue: nvme-wq nvme_scan_work Call Trace: __schedule+0x851/0x1400 schedule+0x99/0x210 io_schedule+0x21/0x70 do_read_cache_page+0xa57/0x1330 read_cache_page+0x4a/0x70 read_dev_sector+0xbf/0x380 amiga_partition+0xc4/0x1230 check_partition+0x30f/0x630 rescan_partitions+0x19a/0x980 __blkdev_get+0x85a/0x12f0 blkdev_get+0x2a5/0x790 __device_add_disk+0xe25/0x1250 device_add_disk+0x13/0x20 nvme_mpath_set_live+0x172/0x2b0 nvme_update_ns_ana_state+0x130/0x180 nvme_set_ns_ana_state+0x9a/0xb0 nvme_parse_ana_log+0x1c3/0x4a0 nvme_mpath_add_disk+0x157/0x290 nvme_validate_ns+0x1017/0x1bd0 nvme_scan_work+0x44d/0x6a0 process_one_work+0x7d7/0x1240 worker_thread+0x8e/0xff0 kthread+0x2c3/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 INFO: task kworker/u4:1:1034 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6-vmlocalyes-00005-g808c8c2dc0cf #316 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. kworker/u4:1 D 0 1034 2 0x80004000 Workqueue: nvme-delete-wq nvme_delete_ctrl_work Call Trace: __schedule+0x851/0x1400 schedule+0x99/0x210 schedule_timeout+0x390/0x830 wait_for_completion+0x1a7/0x310 __flush_work+0x241/0x5d0 flush_work+0x10/0x20 nvme_remove_namespaces+0x85/0x3d0 nvme_do_delete_ctrl+0xb4/0x1e0 nvme_delete_ctrl_work+0x15/0x20 process_one_work+0x7d7/0x1240 worker_thread+0x8e/0xff0 kthread+0x2c3/0x3b0 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 -- Reported-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Tested-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

This reverts commit e47110e. While I was doing zram testing, I found sometimes decompression failed since the compression buffer was corrupted. With investigation, I found below commit calls cond_resched unconditionally so it could make a problem in atomic context if the task is reschedule. Revert the original commit for now. [ 55.109012] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:108^M [ 55.110774] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 946, name: memhog^M [ 55.111973] 3 locks held by memhog/946:^M [ 55.112807] #0: ffff9d01d4b193e8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: __mm_populate+0x103/0x160^M [ 55.114151] #1: ffffffffa3d53de0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xa98/0x1160^M [ 55.115848] #2: ffff9d01d56b8110 (&zspage->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: zs_map_object+0x8e/0x1f0^M [ 55.118947] CPU: 0 PID: 946 Comm: memhog Not tainted 5.9.3-00011-gc5bfc0287345-dirty torvalds#316^M [ 55.121265] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1 04/01/2014^M [ 55.122540] Call Trace:^M [ 55.122974] dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8^M [ 55.123588] ___might_sleep.cold+0xb6/0xc6^M [ 55.124328] unmap_kernel_range_noflush+0x2eb/0x350^M [ 55.125198] unmap_kernel_range+0x14/0x30^M [ 55.125920] zs_unmap_object+0xd5/0xe0^M [ 55.126604] zram_bvec_rw.isra.0+0x38c/0x8e0^M [ 55.127462] zram_rw_page+0x90/0x101^M [ 55.128199] bdev_write_page+0x92/0xe0^M [ 55.128957] ? swap_slot_free_notify+0xb0/0xb0^M [ 55.129841] __swap_writepage+0x94/0x4a0^M [ 55.130636] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0^M [ 55.131462] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30^M [ 55.132261] ? page_swapcount+0x6c/0x90^M [ 55.133038] pageout+0xe3/0x3a0^M [ 55.133702] shrink_page_list+0xb94/0xd60^M [ 55.134626] shrink_inactive_list+0x158/0x460^M Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Harish Sriram <harish@linux.ibm.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>

While I was doing zram testing, I found sometimes decompression failed since the compression buffer was corrupted. With investigation, I found below commit calls cond_resched unconditionally so it could make a problem in atomic context if the task is reschedule. [ 55.109012] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:108 [ 55.110774] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 946, name: memhog [ 55.111973] 3 locks held by memhog/946: [ 55.112807] #0: ffff9d01d4b193e8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: __mm_populate+0x103/0x160 [ 55.114151] #1: ffffffffa3d53de0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xa98/0x1160 [ 55.115848] #2: ffff9d01d56b8110 (&zspage->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: zs_map_object+0x8e/0x1f0 [ 55.118947] CPU: 0 PID: 946 Comm: memhog Not tainted 5.9.3-00011-gc5bfc0287345-dirty torvalds#316 [ 55.121265] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 55.122540] Call Trace: [ 55.122974] dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 [ 55.123588] ___might_sleep.cold+0xb6/0xc6 [ 55.124328] unmap_kernel_range_noflush+0x2eb/0x350 [ 55.125198] unmap_kernel_range+0x14/0x30 [ 55.125920] zs_unmap_object+0xd5/0xe0 [ 55.126604] zram_bvec_rw.isra.0+0x38c/0x8e0 [ 55.127462] zram_rw_page+0x90/0x101 [ 55.128199] bdev_write_page+0x92/0xe0 [ 55.128957] ? swap_slot_free_notify+0xb0/0xb0 [ 55.129841] __swap_writepage+0x94/0x4a0 [ 55.130636] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 [ 55.131462] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 [ 55.132261] ? page_swapcount+0x6c/0x90 [ 55.133038] pageout+0xe3/0x3a0 [ 55.133702] shrink_page_list+0xb94/0xd60 [ 55.134626] shrink_inactive_list+0x158/0x460 We can fix this by removing the ZSMALLOC_PGTABLE_MAPPING feature (which contains the offending calling code) from zsmalloc. Even though this option showed some amount improvement(e.g., 30%) in some arm32 platforms, it has been headache to maintain since it have abused APIs[1](e.g., unmap_kernel_range in atomic context). Since we are approaching to deprecate 32bit machines and already made the config option available for only builtin build since v5.8, lastly it has been not default option in zsmalloc, it's time to drop the option for better maintenance. [1] http://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20201105170249.387069-1-minchan@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117202916.GA3856507@google.com Fixes: e47110e ("mm/vunmap: add cond_resched() in vunmap_pmd_range") Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Harish Sriram <harish@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

While I was doing zram testing, I found sometimes decompression failed since the compression buffer was corrupted. With investigation, I found below commit calls cond_resched unconditionally so it could make a problem in atomic context if the task is reschedule. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:108 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 946, name: memhog 3 locks held by memhog/946: #0: ffff9d01d4b193e8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: __mm_populate+0x103/0x160 #1: ffffffffa3d53de0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xa98/0x1160 #2: ffff9d01d56b8110 (&zspage->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: zs_map_object+0x8e/0x1f0 CPU: 0 PID: 946 Comm: memhog Not tainted 5.9.3-00011-gc5bfc0287345-dirty #316 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: unmap_kernel_range_noflush+0x2eb/0x350 unmap_kernel_range+0x14/0x30 zs_unmap_object+0xd5/0xe0 zram_bvec_rw.isra.0+0x38c/0x8e0 zram_rw_page+0x90/0x101 bdev_write_page+0x92/0xe0 __swap_writepage+0x94/0x4a0 pageout+0xe3/0x3a0 shrink_page_list+0xb94/0xd60 shrink_inactive_list+0x158/0x460 We can fix this by removing the ZSMALLOC_PGTABLE_MAPPING feature (which contains the offending calling code) from zsmalloc. Even though this option showed some amount improvement(e.g., 30%) in some arm32 platforms, it has been headache to maintain since it have abused APIs[1](e.g., unmap_kernel_range in atomic context). Since we are approaching to deprecate 32bit machines and already made the config option available for only builtin build since v5.8, lastly it has been not default option in zsmalloc, it's time to drop the option for better maintenance. [1] http://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20201105170249.387069-1-minchan@kernel.org Fixes: e47110e ("mm/vunmap: add cond_resched() in vunmap_pmd_range") Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Harish Sriram <harish@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117202916.GA3856507@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

commit e91d8d7 upstream. While I was doing zram testing, I found sometimes decompression failed since the compression buffer was corrupted. With investigation, I found below commit calls cond_resched unconditionally so it could make a problem in atomic context if the task is reschedule. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:108 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 946, name: memhog 3 locks held by memhog/946: #0: ffff9d01d4b193e8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: __mm_populate+0x103/0x160 Freescale#1: ffffffffa3d53de0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xa98/0x1160 Freescale#2: ffff9d01d56b8110 (&zspage->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: zs_map_object+0x8e/0x1f0 CPU: 0 PID: 946 Comm: memhog Not tainted 5.9.3-00011-gc5bfc0287345-dirty Freescale#316 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: unmap_kernel_range_noflush+0x2eb/0x350 unmap_kernel_range+0x14/0x30 zs_unmap_object+0xd5/0xe0 zram_bvec_rw.isra.0+0x38c/0x8e0 zram_rw_page+0x90/0x101 bdev_write_page+0x92/0xe0 __swap_writepage+0x94/0x4a0 pageout+0xe3/0x3a0 shrink_page_list+0xb94/0xd60 shrink_inactive_list+0x158/0x460 We can fix this by removing the ZSMALLOC_PGTABLE_MAPPING feature (which contains the offending calling code) from zsmalloc. Even though this option showed some amount improvement(e.g., 30%) in some arm32 platforms, it has been headache to maintain since it have abused APIs[1](e.g., unmap_kernel_range in atomic context). Since we are approaching to deprecate 32bit machines and already made the config option available for only builtin build since v5.8, lastly it has been not default option in zsmalloc, it's time to drop the option for better maintenance. [1] http://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20201105170249.387069-1-minchan@kernel.org Fixes: e47110e ("mm/vunmap: add cond_resched() in vunmap_pmd_range") Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Harish Sriram <harish@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117202916.GA3856507@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit e91d8d7 upstream. While I was doing zram testing, I found sometimes decompression failed since the compression buffer was corrupted. With investigation, I found below commit calls cond_resched unconditionally so it could make a problem in atomic context if the task is reschedule. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:108 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 946, name: memhog 3 locks held by memhog/946: #0: ffff9d01d4b193e8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: __mm_populate+0x103/0x160 #1: ffffffffa3d53de0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xa98/0x1160 #2: ffff9d01d56b8110 (&zspage->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: zs_map_object+0x8e/0x1f0 CPU: 0 PID: 946 Comm: memhog Not tainted 5.9.3-00011-gc5bfc0287345-dirty #316 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: unmap_kernel_range_noflush+0x2eb/0x350 unmap_kernel_range+0x14/0x30 zs_unmap_object+0xd5/0xe0 zram_bvec_rw.isra.0+0x38c/0x8e0 zram_rw_page+0x90/0x101 bdev_write_page+0x92/0xe0 __swap_writepage+0x94/0x4a0 pageout+0xe3/0x3a0 shrink_page_list+0xb94/0xd60 shrink_inactive_list+0x158/0x460 We can fix this by removing the ZSMALLOC_PGTABLE_MAPPING feature (which contains the offending calling code) from zsmalloc. Even though this option showed some amount improvement(e.g., 30%) in some arm32 platforms, it has been headache to maintain since it have abused APIs[1](e.g., unmap_kernel_range in atomic context). Since we are approaching to deprecate 32bit machines and already made the config option available for only builtin build since v5.8, lastly it has been not default option in zsmalloc, it's time to drop the option for better maintenance. [1] http://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20201105170249.387069-1-minchan@kernel.org Fixes: e47110e ("mm/vunmap: add cond_resched() in vunmap_pmd_range") Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Harish Sriram <harish@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117202916.GA3856507@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com>

…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Prevent bindgen from generating `#[derive(Debug)]`

…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 #311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 #314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

PD#150094: driver defect clean up: torvalds#32 torvalds#86 torvalds#90 torvalds#92 torvalds#97 torvalds#101 torvalds#103 torvalds#152 torvalds#155 torvalds#157~torvalds#158 torvalds#164 torvalds#167 torvalds#169~torvalds#179 torvalds#187~torvalds#191 torvalds#193~torvalds#199 torvalds#201~torvalds#210 torvalds#212~torvalds#213 torvalds#316~torvalds#319 torvalds#385 torvalds#572 torvalds#693~torvalds#694 torvalds#696~torvalds#697 Change-Id: I9669e5c0d717ee2287faf57a271ff27692039802 Signed-off-by: Guosong Zhou <guosong.zhou@amlogic.com>

Enable CPU v4 instruction tests for arm64. Below are the test results from BPF test_progs selftests: # ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn,verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap torvalds#115/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:OK torvalds#115/2 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:OK torvalds#115/3 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:OK torvalds#115 ldsx_insn:OK torvalds#302/1 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK torvalds#302/2 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#302/3 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK torvalds#302/4 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#302/5 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK torvalds#302/6 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK torvalds#302 verifier_bswap:OK torvalds#316/1 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK torvalds#316/2 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK torvalds#316 verifier_gotol:OK torvalds#324/1 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK torvalds#324/2 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/3 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK torvalds#324/4 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/5 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK torvalds#324/6 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/7 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK torvalds#324/8 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK torvalds#324/9 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/10 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK torvalds#324/11 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#324 verifier_ldsx:OK torvalds#335/1 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK torvalds#335/2 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/3 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK torvalds#335/4 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/5 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK torvalds#335/6 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/7 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK torvalds#335/8 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/9 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK torvalds#335/10 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/11 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#335/12 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/13 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#335/14 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/15 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK torvalds#335/16 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/17 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#335/18 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/19 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#335/20 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/21 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK torvalds#335/22 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/23 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK torvalds#335/24 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK torvalds#335 verifier_movsx:OK torvalds#347/1 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/2 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/3 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/4 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/5 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/6 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/7 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/8 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/9 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/10 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/11 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/12 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/13 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/14 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/15 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/16 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/17 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/18 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/19 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/20 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/21 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/22 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/23 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/24 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/25 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/26 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/27 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/28 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/29 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/30 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/31 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/32 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/33 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/34 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/35 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/36 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/37 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/38 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/39 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/40 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/41 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/42 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/43 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/44 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/45 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/46 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/47 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/48 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/49 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/50 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/51 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/52 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/53 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/54 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/55 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/56 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/57 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/58 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/59 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/60 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/61 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/62 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/63 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/64 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/65 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/66 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/67 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/68 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/69 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/70 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/71 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/72 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/73 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/74 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/75 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/76 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/77 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/78 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/79 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/80 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/81 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/82 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/83 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/84 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/85 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/86 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/87 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/88 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/89 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/90 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/91 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/92 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/93 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/94 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/95 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/96 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/97 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/98 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/99 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347 verifier_sdiv:OK Summary: 6/166 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230815154158.717901-8-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com

Enable cpu v4 tests for LoongArch. Currently, we don't have BPF trampoline in LoongArch JIT, so the fentry test `test_ptr_struct_arg` still failed, will followup. Test result attached below: # ./test_progs -t verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap torvalds#316/1 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK torvalds#316/2 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#316/3 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK torvalds#316/4 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#316/5 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK torvalds#316/6 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK torvalds#316 verifier_bswap:OK torvalds#330/1 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK torvalds#330/2 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK torvalds#330 verifier_gotol:OK torvalds#338/1 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK torvalds#338/2 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/3 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK torvalds#338/4 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/5 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK torvalds#338/6 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/7 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK torvalds#338/8 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK torvalds#338/9 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/10 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK torvalds#338/11 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#338 verifier_ldsx:OK torvalds#349/1 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK torvalds#349/2 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/3 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK torvalds#349/4 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/5 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK torvalds#349/6 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/7 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK torvalds#349/8 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/9 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK torvalds#349/10 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/11 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#349/12 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/13 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#349/14 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/15 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK torvalds#349/16 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/17 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#349/18 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/19 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#349/20 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/21 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK torvalds#349/22 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/23 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK torvalds#349/24 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK torvalds#349 verifier_movsx:OK torvalds#361/1 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/2 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/3 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/4 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/5 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/6 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/7 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/8 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/9 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/10 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/11 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/12 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/13 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/14 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/15 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/16 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/17 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/18 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/19 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/20 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/21 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/22 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/23 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/24 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/25 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/26 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/27 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/28 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/29 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/30 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/31 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/32 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/33 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/34 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/35 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/36 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/37 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/38 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/39 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/40 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/41 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/42 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/43 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/44 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/45 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/46 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/47 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/48 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/49 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/50 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/51 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/52 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/53 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/54 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/55 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/56 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/57 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/58 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/59 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/60 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/61 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/62 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/63 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/64 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/65 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/66 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/67 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/68 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/69 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/70 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/71 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/72 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/73 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/74 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/75 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/76 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/77 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/78 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/79 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/80 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/81 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/82 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/83 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/84 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/85 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/86 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/87 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/88 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/89 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/90 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/91 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/92 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/93 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/94 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/95 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/96 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/97 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/98 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/99 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361 verifier_sdiv:OK Summary: 5/163 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED # ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__open 0 nsec test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_map_val_and_probed_memory:FAIL:test_ldsx_insn__attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) torvalds#116/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:FAIL torvalds#116/2 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:OK torvalds#116/3 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:OK torvalds#116 ldsx_insn:FAIL All error logs: test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__open 0 nsec test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_map_val_and_probed_memory:FAIL:test_ldsx_insn__attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) torvalds#116/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:FAIL torvalds#116 ldsx_insn:FAIL Summary: 0/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>

Enable the cpu v4 tests for LoongArch. Currently, we don't have BPF trampoline in LoongArch JIT, so the fentry test `test_ptr_struct_arg` still failed, will followup. Test result attached below: # ./test_progs -t verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap torvalds#316/1 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK torvalds#316/2 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#316/3 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK torvalds#316/4 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#316/5 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK torvalds#316/6 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK torvalds#316 verifier_bswap:OK torvalds#330/1 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK torvalds#330/2 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK torvalds#330 verifier_gotol:OK torvalds#338/1 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK torvalds#338/2 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/3 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK torvalds#338/4 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/5 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK torvalds#338/6 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/7 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK torvalds#338/8 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK torvalds#338/9 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/10 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK torvalds#338/11 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#338 verifier_ldsx:OK torvalds#349/1 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK torvalds#349/2 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/3 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK torvalds#349/4 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/5 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK torvalds#349/6 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/7 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK torvalds#349/8 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/9 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK torvalds#349/10 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/11 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#349/12 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/13 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#349/14 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/15 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK torvalds#349/16 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/17 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#349/18 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/19 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#349/20 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/21 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK torvalds#349/22 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/23 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK torvalds#349/24 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK torvalds#349 verifier_movsx:OK torvalds#361/1 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/2 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/3 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/4 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/5 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/6 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/7 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/8 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/9 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/10 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/11 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/12 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/13 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/14 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/15 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/16 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/17 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/18 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/19 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/20 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/21 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/22 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/23 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/24 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/25 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/26 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/27 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/28 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/29 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/30 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/31 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/32 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/33 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/34 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/35 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/36 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/37 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/38 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/39 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/40 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/41 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/42 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/43 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/44 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/45 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/46 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/47 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/48 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/49 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/50 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/51 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/52 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/53 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/54 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/55 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/56 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/57 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/58 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/59 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/60 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/61 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/62 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/63 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/64 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/65 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/66 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/67 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/68 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/69 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/70 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/71 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/72 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/73 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/74 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/75 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/76 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/77 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/78 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/79 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/80 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/81 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/82 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/83 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/84 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/85 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/86 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/87 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/88 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/89 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/90 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/91 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/92 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/93 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/94 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/95 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/96 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/97 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/98 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/99 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361 verifier_sdiv:OK Summary: 5/163 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED # ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__open 0 nsec test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_map_val_and_probed_memory:FAIL:test_ldsx_insn__attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) torvalds#116/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:FAIL torvalds#116/2 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:OK torvalds#116/3 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:OK torvalds#116 ldsx_insn:FAIL All error logs: test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__open 0 nsec test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_map_val_and_probed_memory:FAIL:test_ldsx_insn__attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) torvalds#116/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:FAIL torvalds#116 ldsx_insn:FAIL Summary: 0/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>

In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ] In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

@2

Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

@2

[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ] Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

@2

[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ] Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

@2

[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ] Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065400 [ Upstream commit a51cd6b ] In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <manuel.diewald@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com>

Enable the cpu v4 tests for LoongArch. Currently, we don't have BPF trampoline in LoongArch JIT, so the fentry test `test_ptr_struct_arg` still failed, will followup. Test result attached below: # ./test_progs -t verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap torvalds#316/1 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK torvalds#316/2 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#316/3 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK torvalds#316/4 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#316/5 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK torvalds#316/6 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK torvalds#316 verifier_bswap:OK torvalds#330/1 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK torvalds#330/2 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK torvalds#330 verifier_gotol:OK torvalds#338/1 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK torvalds#338/2 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/3 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK torvalds#338/4 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/5 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK torvalds#338/6 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/7 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK torvalds#338/8 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK torvalds#338/9 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#338/10 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK torvalds#338/11 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#338 verifier_ldsx:OK torvalds#349/1 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK torvalds#349/2 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/3 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK torvalds#349/4 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/5 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK torvalds#349/6 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/7 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK torvalds#349/8 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/9 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK torvalds#349/10 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/11 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#349/12 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/13 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#349/14 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/15 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK torvalds#349/16 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/17 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#349/18 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/19 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#349/20 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/21 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK torvalds#349/22 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#349/23 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK torvalds#349/24 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK torvalds#349 verifier_movsx:OK torvalds#361/1 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/2 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/3 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/4 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/5 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/6 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/7 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/8 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/9 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/10 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/11 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/12 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/13 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/14 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/15 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/16 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/17 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/18 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/19 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/20 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/21 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/22 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/23 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/24 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/25 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/26 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/27 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/28 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/29 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/30 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/31 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/32 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/33 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/34 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/35 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/36 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/37 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/38 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/39 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/40 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/41 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/42 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/43 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/44 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/45 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/46 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/47 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/48 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/49 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/50 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/51 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/52 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/53 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/54 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/55 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/56 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/57 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/58 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/59 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/60 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/61 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/62 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/63 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/64 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/65 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/66 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/67 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/68 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/69 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/70 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/71 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/72 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/73 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/74 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/75 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/76 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/77 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/78 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/79 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/80 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/81 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/82 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/83 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/84 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/85 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/86 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/87 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/88 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/89 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/90 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/91 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/92 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/93 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/94 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/95 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/96 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/97 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#361/98 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/99 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#361/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#361/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#361/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#361/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#361/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#361/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#361/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#361/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#361 verifier_sdiv:OK Summary: 5/163 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED # ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__open 0 nsec test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_map_val_and_probed_memory:FAIL:test_ldsx_insn__attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) torvalds#116/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:FAIL torvalds#116/2 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:OK torvalds#116/3 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:OK torvalds#116 ldsx_insn:FAIL All error logs: test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__open 0 nsec test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_map_val_and_probed_memory:FAIL:test_ldsx_insn__attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) torvalds#116/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:FAIL torvalds#116 ldsx_insn:FAIL Summary: 0/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>

fixed return value

289297f

Fixed return value... selinux_enabled to "selinux_is_enabled"

Lavender204 closed this Sep 13, 2016

laijs pushed a commit to laijs/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2017

Merge pull request torvalds#316 from libos-nuse/feature-conf-memsize

4a42464

lkl: add LKL_HIJACK_BOOT_CMDLINE option to configure boot cmdline

nbdd0121 pushed a commit to nbdd0121/linux that referenced this pull request May 29, 2021

Merge pull request torvalds#316 from nbdd0121/rust

51a2b6c

Prevent bindgen from generating `#[derive(Debug)]`

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

fixed return value #316

fixed return value #316

Lavender204 commented Aug 31, 2016

lenovouser commented Sep 2, 2016

Lavender204 commented Sep 4, 2016

lenovouser commented Sep 4, 2016

fixed return value #316

fixed return value #316

Conversation

Lavender204 commented Aug 31, 2016

lenovouser commented Sep 2, 2016

Lavender204 commented Sep 4, 2016

lenovouser commented Sep 4, 2016