style:Run dotnet format

[HavenDV]

Created by Github Actions

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Improved code readability through formatting adjustments across various files.
  • Removed unnecessary blank lines to enhance code clarity without affecting functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily focus on code formatting and readability improvements across multiple files. Adjustments include the removal of unnecessary blank lines, reformatting of switch cases, and consistent indentation. The underlying logic and functionality of the code remain unchanged, ensuring that all existing features continue to operate as intended.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
src/Cli/src/Helpers.cs	Reformatted switch cases for improved readability; no changes to logic or functionality.
src/Core/test/UnitTests/Chains/ConversationalRetrieval/ConversationalRetrievalChainTests.cs	Minor formatting change by removing a blank line in the GetChatResponses method; functionality unchanged.
src/Meta/test/DatabaseTests.OpenSearch.cs	Removed a blank line between two method definitions; no impact on functionality.
src/Meta/test/WikiTests.GettingStartedWithAmazonBedrock.cs	Adjusted formatting by removing unnecessary blank lines; core functionality remains unchanged.

Possibly related PRs

• style:Run dotnet format #298: This PR involves minor formatting changes, including the removal of trailing whitespace, which aligns with the reformatting focus of the main PR.
• style:Run dotnet format #309: Similar to the main PR, this PR includes the removal of trailing whitespaces and extra blank lines, indicating a shared emphasis on code formatting.
• style:Run dotnet format #319: This PR also focuses on formatting adjustments, including the removal of extra whitespace, which relates to the main PR's goal of improving code readability.
• style:Run dotnet format #325: This PR involves minor formatting adjustments and reordering of statements, which is consistent with the main PR's objective of enhancing code clarity through reformatting.

🐇 In the code, we hop and play,
Removing whitespace, brightening the way.
With every line, we tidy and cheer,
Making our logic crystal clear!
So let’s celebrate, with a joyful dance,
For cleaner code gives us all a chance! 🌟

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c9ee67 and 670d381.

Files selected for processing (4)

• src/Cli/src/Helpers.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Core/test/UnitTests/Chains/ConversationalRetrieval/ConversationalRetrievalChainTests.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Meta/test/DatabaseTests.OpenSearch.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Meta/test/WikiTests.GettingStartedWithAmazonBedrock.cs (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)

• src/Core/test/UnitTests/Chains/ConversationalRetrieval/ConversationalRetrievalChainTests.cs
• src/Meta/test/DatabaseTests.OpenSearch.cs
• src/Meta/test/WikiTests.GettingStartedWithAmazonBedrock.cs

Additional comments not posted (4)

src/Cli/src/Helpers.cs (4)

73-86: LGTM: Improved code formatting

The changes in this segment improve the code's readability by adding braces and proper indentation. The logic remains unchanged, which is good.

Also applies to: 88-88

---

90-95: LGTM: Consistent formatting applied

The changes in this segment maintain consistency with the previous case, improving overall readability. The logic for the OpenRouter provider remains intact.

---

102-102: LGTM: Improved method separation

The addition of an empty line at the end of the GetChatModelAsync method improves readability by clearly separating it from the next method.

---

Line range hint 1-102: Summary: Successful code formatting

The changes in this file are purely formatting-related, aligning with the PR objective of running dotnet format. The improvements include:

1. Consistent use of braces for switch cases.
2. Proper indentation within switch cases.
3. Addition of an empty line for better method separation.

These changes enhance code readability without altering any logic. The formatting is consistent throughout the file, which is a positive outcome of using an automated formatting tool.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.