Remove implicit block expectation syntax #128
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Huh, that's a strange change to be doing in a patch release indeed. I'll take a look when I get to a machine that doesn't freeze when looking at the diff like my mobile does 😅 |
valscion
approved these changes
Oct 3, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Whee https://github.com/venuu/jsonapi-authorization/pull/128.patch view allowed me to review this 😄. Looks good, thank you!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While attempting to run specs to investigate compatibility with JR
v0.10.0, I ran into several failures with the newly releasedrspec-expectationsv3.8.5rspec/rspec-expectations#1125 removed the ability to use implicit block expectations