add MPL-2.0-no-copyleft-exception to the allow list #8194
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
9 Ignored Deployments
|
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
🟢 CI successful 🟢Thanks |
🟢 Turbopack Benchmark CI successful 🟢Thanks |
bgw
approved these changes
May 22, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I feel like this is fine, but I also feel like the prehash library isn't providing much value, as it's probably <50 LOC not counting comments.
If you want code we already own that you can copy from, I added this implementation to hstr (used in swc): https://github.com/dudykr/ddbase/blob/main/crates/hstr/src/dynamic.rs#L189-L228
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
In this PR #8174 the library prehash is licensed using MPL2.0 (great) but without the copyleft exception.
I believe that we are OK. From what I understand this prevents us from making and redistributing changes to this library under one of the MPL secondary licenses ("Secondary License" means either the GNU General Public License, Version 2.0, the GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1, the GNU Affero General Public License, Version 3.0, or any later versions of those licenses).
It does not exclude us from using that library in a 'larger work' that is licensed using a different (compatible) license so for the purpose of distributing a binary it is the same as MPL-2.0
Testing Instructions
N/A