Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Push eFilter down. #4270

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 6, 2022

Conversation

Shylock-Hg
Copy link
Contributor

@Shylock-Hg Shylock-Hg commented May 20, 2022

What type of PR is this?

  • bug
  • feature
  • enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

Description:

Push down eFilter of Traverse executor.

How do you solve it?

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

Checklist:

Tests:

  • Unit test(positive and negative cases)
  • Function test
  • Performance test
  • N/A

Affects:

  • Documentation affected (Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
  • Incompatibility (If it breaks the compatibility, please describe it and add the label.)
  • If it's needed to cherry-pick (If cherry-pick to some branches is required, please label the destination version(s).)
  • Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory

Release notes:

Please confirm whether to be reflected in release notes and how to describe:

ex. Fixed the bug .....

@Shylock-Hg Shylock-Hg added type/enhancement Type: make the code neat or more efficient ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test labels May 20, 2022
@Shylock-Hg Shylock-Hg added this to the v3.2.0 milestone May 20, 2022
// The Zero step require don't apply eFilter in GetNeighbors,
// but 1 step edges require apply eFilter in GetNeighbors,
// they are confliction, so don't push down when zero step enabled.
return traverse->eFilter() != nullptr && !traverse->zeroStep();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Emmm, the filter would not be applied to any edges if 0 steps, maybe its not an constraint?

@CPWstatic
Copy link
Contributor

Suggest more comments to explain the opt rules.

CPWstatic
CPWstatic previously approved these changes May 30, 2022
czpmango
czpmango previously approved these changes May 30, 2022
@Shylock-Hg Shylock-Hg dismissed stale reviews from czpmango and CPWstatic via 2906108 May 31, 2022 01:58
CPWstatic
CPWstatic previously approved these changes May 31, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@czpmango czpmango left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie merged commit 32f449f into vesoft-inc:master Jun 6, 2022
@Shylock-Hg Shylock-Hg deleted the optimize/push-eFilter-down branch June 6, 2022 06:52
@critical27 critical27 mentioned this pull request Aug 23, 2022
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test type/enhancement Type: make the code neat or more efficient
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants