Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[k-hop]Remove useless inner join for go in simple case #4556

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2022

Conversation

jievince
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

  • bug
  • feature
  • enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

Description:

How do you solve it?

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

Checklist:

Tests:

  • Unit test(positive and negative cases)
  • Function test
  • Performance test
  • N/A

Affects:

  • Documentation affected (Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
  • Incompatibility (If it breaks the compatibility, please describe it and add the label.)
  • If it's needed to cherry-pick (If cherry-pick to some branches is required, please label the destination version(s).)
  • Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory

Release notes:

Please confirm whether to be reflected in release notes and how to describe:

ex. Fixed the bug .....

@jievince jievince added the ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test label Aug 19, 2022
@Shylock-Hg
Copy link
Contributor

Where you create GetDstBySrc plan node ?

Comment on lines +600 to 606
if (goCtx_->isSimple) {
// We don't need to do a inner join in such case.
goCtx_->joinInput = false;
}
if (goCtx_->isSimple) {
goCtx_->yieldExpr->columns()[0]->setExpr(InputPropertyExpression::make(qctx->objPool(), kDst));
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Duplicate condition

@jievince jievince changed the title Remove useless inner join for go in simple case [k-hop]Remove useless inner join for go in simple case Aug 19, 2022
@Shinji-IkariG Shinji-IkariG merged commit d0e289c into vesoft-inc:master Aug 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants