Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix the bug when alter column that doesn't have a default value to no… #5105

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 26, 2022

Conversation

jievince
Copy link
Contributor

…t nullable

What type of PR is this?

  • bug
  • feature
  • enhancement

What problem(s) does this PR solve?

Issue(s) number:

Fix https://github.com/vesoft-inc/nebula-ent/issues/1973
Fix #4809

Description:

How do you solve it?

Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:

Checklist:

Tests:

  • Unit test(positive and negative cases)
  • Function test
  • Performance test
  • N/A

Affects:

  • Documentation affected (Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
  • Incompatibility (If it breaks the compatibility, please describe it and add the label.)
  • If it's needed to cherry-pick (If cherry-pick to some branches is required, please label the destination version(s).)
  • Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory

Release notes:

Please confirm whether to be reflected in release notes and how to describe:

ex. Fixed the bug .....

@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added the ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test label Dec 23, 2022
@Sophie-Xie Sophie-Xie added the priority/hi-pri Priority: high label Dec 26, 2022
@jievince jievince added the doc affected PR: improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 26, 2022
@@ -59,6 +60,12 @@ static Status validateColumns(const std::vector<ColumnSpecification *> &columnSp
if (!column.nullable_ref().has_value()) {
column.nullable_ref() = true;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found this problem recently as well, do you know why? This is quite implicit...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found this problem recently as well, do you know why? This is quite implicit...

Is there any related issue? I don't know which problem you're talking about.

critical27
critical27 previously approved these changes Dec 26, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@critical27 critical27 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job~

xtcyclist
xtcyclist previously approved these changes Dec 26, 2022
@abby-cyber
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc affected PR: improvements or additions to documentation priority/hi-pri Priority: high ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

An error is reported using the lookup statement -1005:Storage Error: part: 1, error: E_RPC_FAILURE(-3).
6 participants