-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 946
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add more configuration options for helm chart #2788
Add more configuration options for helm chart #2788
Conversation
0ea6e9e
to
4169ab4
Compare
Looks like check fail is not related to the changes of this PR. @wangyang0616 , please, take a look. |
See issue: #2777, this issue has proposed a repair PR (#2780), and it should be able to solve the current CI problem after being merged |
4169ab4
to
192f1f8
Compare
/priority important-soon |
192f1f8
to
9f5af53
Compare
The repair PR (#2780) helped, after rebasing the checks are successful. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: william-wang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@Aakcht please help to handle the confliction:) |
9f5af53
to
6e847df
Compare
Hi, @william-wang . As I see, there was this PR #2836 that was merged and it added nodeSelector & affinity & tolerations(it caused the conflicts). I rebased and reverted the changes from that PR since I think it would be better to be able to set nodeSelector/affinity/tolerations per component also(as in this PR). If you think it would be better to change default nodeSelector/affinity/tolerations parameter names in accordance with #2836, please tell me. |
@Aakcht Agree with you, it's better to configure affinity/toleration/selector per component. Please make the ci happy and we can merge this pr. |
@william-wang looks like I'll need help with the CI.
|
I also see the same error as in |
@Aakcht Master's code verify encountered an error and has been repaired. refer to pr: fix goimport check error #2849 After the #2849 is merged, you can rebase the master. |
6e847df
to
65c9805
Compare
Hello, @wangyang0616 , @william-wang I rebased the PR, now all the checks are successful. |
4ece413
to
64768c9
Compare
Hi, @william-wang, I rebased the PR one more time case there were new merge conflicts - now all should be good, please take a look. |
Hey all, just adding that this PR would ease the Helm chart configuration for my specific deployment circumstance. I need to add tolerations and node selectors to all deployment components, but #2836 on master is missing the configurability on the |
64768c9
to
6f4136a
Compare
Hi, @hwdef @wangyang0616 @Thor-wl @william-wang , looking for review/aproval/merge. |
d6fe4b3
to
ae1f151
Compare
Please close PR and reopen it to retrigger CI |
@wangyang0616 Please check this CI failed. |
Signed-off-by: aakcht <aakcht@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: aakcht <aakcht@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: aakcht <aakcht@gmail.com>
ae1f151
to
eb1f1c4
Compare
Hi, @hwdef @wangyang0616 @Thor-wl @william-wang , please take a look, the checks are now successful. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
This PR adds possibility to specify affinity/tolerations/securityContext/nodeSelector/labels in helm chart for main Volcano pods(scheduler/admission/controller).
resolves #2779