-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes issue for saving model files with missing keys #1151
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
217f70b
Fixes issue when key dont exist
avdudchenko e066bd3
Fixes issue with empty h5 files
avdudchenko a84688b
Merge branch 'main' into ps-tool-fixes
avdudchenko 03b21ac
added test for missing key fix and couple other small fixes.
avdudchenko 42e5040
Merge branch 'ps-tool-fixes' of https://github.com/avdudchenko/watert…
avdudchenko f8ce57a
Fjxes to mpit testing
avdudchenko 20d7e5a
Merge branch 'main' into ps-tool-fixes
avdudchenko f3f119e
Update watertap/tools/parameter_sweep/tests/test_parameter_sweep.py
avdudchenko 33a7fdc
Merge branch 'main' into ps-tool-fixes
avdudchenko 20e9e3f
Merge branch 'main' into ps-tool-fixes
avdudchenko a2b2f84
mac fix
avdudchenko 1f0949e
Update test_parameter_sweep.py
avdudchenko File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What would be needed to make this test work with an arbitrary number of workers? This could be dealt with in a subsequent PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its a minum number - if you have 1 worker then we don't test for missing keys. I think we should really just change how we store results from each solve (e.g instead of storing all results in arrays inside a result dictionory, we just store the value for each parameter in a dict and store an array of dicts--not sure how MPI safe that is but that would solve this issue. - this would be same as async multiprocessing or ray implementation, where we split parmans into size of 1...