Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.github: Run the tests in the CI #78

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

.github: Run the tests in the CI #78

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

alistair23
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@alistair23 alistair23 force-pushed the alistair/ci-test branch 2 times, most recently from 6d7b22f to 4bc7766 Compare June 24, 2024 23:56
@alistair23 alistair23 requested a review from twilfredo July 1, 2024 00:21
@twilfredo
Copy link
Collaborator

Do you think it's possible to fire-off a QEMU guest in CI, and do storage testing against the kernel too?

Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
@alistair23
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Do you think it's possible to fire-off a QEMU guest in CI, and do storage testing against the kernel too?

It should be. We probably need it in upstream QEMU though, otherwise we have to build a QEMU fork which is a bit of a pain

@alistair23 alistair23 merged commit ecd461d into master Jul 1, 2024
2 checks passed
@alistair23 alistair23 deleted the alistair/ci-test branch July 1, 2024 01:39
@twilfredo
Copy link
Collaborator

Do you think it's possible to fire-off a QEMU guest in CI, and do storage testing against the kernel too?

It should be. We probably need it in upstream QEMU though, otherwise we have to build a QEMU fork which is a bit of a pain

okay, we can add it to the TODO for when SPDM is upsteam

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants