Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correcting SIFT datasize for capacity case #252

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2023

Conversation

devanshsa5
Copy link
Contributor

The Capacity case mentioned in cases.py is fetching 500K docs with 128dims . There is no 100K dataset available for SIFT neither the case.
class CapacityDim128(CapacityCase):
case_id: CaseType = CaseType.CapacityDim128
dataset: DatasetManager = Dataset.SIFT.manager(500_000)
name: str = "Capacity Test (128 Dim Repeated)"
description: str = """This case tests the vector database's loading capacity by repeatedly inserting small-dimension vectors (SIFT 100K vectors, 128 dimensions) until it is fully loaded.
Number of inserted vectors will be reported."""

@devanshsa5 devanshsa5 closed this Dec 20, 2023
@devanshsa5 devanshsa5 reopened this Dec 20, 2023
@devanshsa5
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @XuanYang-cn

@XuanYang-cn
Copy link
Collaborator

@devanshsa5 Good catch!

Copy link
Collaborator

@XuanYang-cn XuanYang-cn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@sre-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: devanshsa5, sarthak-dua27, XuanYang-cn

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@XuanYang-cn XuanYang-cn merged commit c5b7b34 into zilliztech:main Dec 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants