Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add samples and test for the national clouds support in ACR #22127

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2021

Conversation

pallavit
Copy link
Contributor

@pallavit pallavit commented Jun 7, 2021

No description provided.

@check-enforcer
Copy link

check-enforcer bot commented Jun 8, 2021

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment:
/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run java - [service] - ci

}

private static String getAuthenticationScope() {
return null;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use a real authentication scope here so the sample is truly runnable

@pallavit pallavit merged commit af10223 into Azure:master Jun 10, 2021
azure-sdk pushed a commit to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL to add version stable/2022-11-08 (Azure#22124)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL from version preview/2020-10-05-privatepreview to version 2022-11-08

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* empty commit (Azure#21932)

Co-authored-by: Ozan Saka <mesaka@microsoft.com>

* 2022 11 08 (Azure#22025)

* Add private endpoint con. and private link endpoints

* Add private link list example

* Cluster related endpoint and exampled changes

* Cluster changes and configuration updates

* Long running operation header additions

* Change server group to cluster

* Add systemData to examples, fix private endpoint con. property

* Fix private link resource name parameter

* Fix INVALID_TYPE boolean given as strings

* Update approve private endp. con. request body

* Fix OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES and READONLY_PROPERTY_NOT_ALLOWED_IN_REQUEST

* Fix INVALID_TYPE

* Fix ModelValidation Errors

* Fix lint errors

* Fix lint errors

* Remove location from cluster examples

* Update example details, fix common types

* Update readme files, fix configuration example name

* Fix SDK generation by removing wrong pageable tags

* Update configuration response types, fix cluster name pattern

* Update configuration example names

* Readme changes and minor final state via fix

* Fix indentation on suppression items

* Update node count description, remove pec id

* Update cluster examples

* Style fix

* Update description

Co-authored-by: Ozan Saka <mesaka@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Sena Gungor <segungor@microsoft.com>

* Fix credscan password (Azure#22127)

Co-authored-by: Ozan Saka <mesaka@microsoft.com>

* Add required parameters (Azure#22244)

* Add 200 resp. code to put&patch, change boolean to enum (Azure#22290)

* Add 200 resp. code to put&patch, change boolean to enum

* Update 200 responses

* Update 200 response schemas, enum casing

* Update configuration put requests

* Remove role no-op case

* fix private endp con list error, remove 200 code from role example

* Add coord/node config list endpoints

* fix sdk errors

* add 200 resp for configuration put requests

* Update readme

* Fix arm feedbacks (Azure#22334)

* Fix arm feedbacks

* Add pointInTimeUTC

* Update passwords and readme file

* Update response codes to 201, address feedbacks (Azure#22386)

* Update response codes to 201

* Add server configuration get

* Update password

* Fix duplicate operation id

* Update configuration example files

* Update configuration example files

* Fix credscan issue (Azure#22389)

* Fix PutRequestResponseScheme error (Azure#22408)

* Fix PutRequestResponseScheme error

* Update readme file

* Update x-ms-mutability

* Update property description

* Fix server properties (Azure#22772)

* Fix server properties

---------

Co-authored-by: mozansaka <ozan.saka@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ozan Saka <mesaka@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants