Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No emails are shown on the member Invite page - Reported by @parasharrajat #11021

Closed
mvtglobally opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 10 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Engineering Hourly KSv2 Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff Reviewing Has a PR in review

Comments

@mvtglobally
Copy link

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Action Performed:

  1. Open settings page.
  2. Select any workspace(create new if doesn't exists).
  3. Click Members from the menu items.
  4. Press invite button.

Expected Result:

There should be emails/description under the contacts name on the Invite member page

Actual Result:

There is not description available on the contacts where we used to show emails (mostly)

Workaround:

unknown

Platform:

Where is this issue occurring?

  • Web
  • iOS
  • Android
  • Desktop App
  • Mobile Web

Version Number: 1.2.0-5
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
image - 2022-09-15T165004 080

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @parasharrajat
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1663273697996389

View all open jobs on GitHub

@mvtglobally mvtglobally added DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Engineering Daily KSv2 labels Sep 15, 2022
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 15, 2022

Triggered auto assignment to @marcochavezf (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open StagingDeployCash deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@francoisl francoisl self-assigned this Sep 15, 2022
@francoisl francoisl added the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Sep 15, 2022
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot closed this as completed Sep 15, 2022
@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Is this eligible for Reporting bonus?

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor

Ah, good question. I'm not super familiar with the process, @mallenexpensify would you be able to assist please?

@mallenexpensify mallenexpensify added the Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff label Sep 16, 2022
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 16, 2022

A Contributor Manager will be assigned to issue payment via Upwork if we deploy an associated Pull Request to production. Per Contributing.md.

@mallenexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat can you apply please and confirm here once you have?
https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01c28bfad13126d387

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@mallenexpensify Done.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Bump @mallenexpensify.

@mallenexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Paid! Thanks @parasharrajat

@mallenexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

mallenexpensify commented Oct 11, 2022 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Engineering Hourly KSv2 Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff Reviewing Has a PR in review
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants