Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Rpki Encapsulation" #6740

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Conversation

qlyoung
Copy link
Member

@qlyoung qlyoung commented Jul 14, 2020

Reverts #5015

Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>
@qlyoung qlyoung force-pushed the revert-5015-rpki_vrf_encapsulation branch from 7725b74 to 1d4cfa5 Compare July 14, 2020 19:38
@LabN-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

LabN-CI commented Jul 14, 2020

💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

Results table
_ _
Result SUCCESS git merge/6740 1d4cfa5
Date 07/14/2020
Start 16:59:13
Finish 17:25:26
Run-Time 26:13
Total 1815
Pass 1815
Fail 0
Valgrind-Errors 0
Valgrind-Loss 0
Details vncregress-2020-07-14-16:59:13.txt
Log autoscript-2020-07-14-17:00:15.log.bz2
Memory 494 471 426

For details, please contact louberger

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 14, 2020

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Test incomplete. See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-13136/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Incomplete

Topo tests part 0 on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)

Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-13136/test

Topology Tests failed for Topo tests part 0 on Ubuntu 16.04 i386:

*** defaultIntf: warning: r1 has no interfaces
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument

rt3: zebra crashed. Core file found - Backtrace follows:
[New LWP 27876]
[New LWP 27879]
[New LWP 27878]
[New LWP 27877]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `/usr/lib/frr/zebra --log stdout --log-level debug -d'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0xb78827c0 (LWP 27876))]
#0  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
#1  <signal handler called>
#2  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
#3  0xb7e9d8be in frr_run () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/frr/libfrr.so.0
#4  0x004ed8c6 in main ()
2020-07-14 22:24:25,523 ERROR: assert failed at "test_isis_sr_topo1/test_memory_leak": 
rt3: zebra crashed. Core file found - Backtrace follows:
[New LWP 27876]
[New LWP 27879]
[New LWP 27878]
[New LWP 27877]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `/usr/lib/frr/zebra --log stdout --log-level debug -d'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0xb78827c0 (LWP 27876))]
#0  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
#1  <signal handler called>
#2  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
#3  0xb7e9d8be in frr_run () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/frr/libfrr.so.0
#4  0x004ed8c6 in main ()

see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-13136/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt

Topo tests part 0 on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)

Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-13136/test

Topology Tests failed for Topo tests part 0 on Ubuntu 16.04 i386:

*** defaultIntf: warning: r1 has no interfaces
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument

rt3: zebra crashed. Core file found - Backtrace follows:
[New LWP 27876]
[New LWP 27879]
[New LWP 27878]
[New LWP 27877]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `/usr/lib/frr/zebra --log stdout --log-level debug -d'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0xb78827c0 (LWP 27876))]
#0  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
#1  <signal handler called>
#2  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
#3  0xb7e9d8be in frr_run () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/frr/libfrr.so.0
#4  0x004ed8c6 in main ()
2020-07-14 22:24:25,523 ERROR: assert failed at "test_isis_sr_topo1/test_memory_leak": 
rt3: zebra crashed. Core file found - Backtrace follows:
[New LWP 27876]
[New LWP 27879]
[New LWP 27878]
[New LWP 27877]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `/usr/lib/frr/zebra --log stdout --log-level debug -d'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0xb78827c0 (LWP 27876))]
#0  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
#1  <signal handler called>
#2  0xb7f6dcf5 in ?? ()
#3  0xb7e9d8be in frr_run () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/frr/libfrr.so.0
#4  0x004ed8c6 in main ()

see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-13136/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt

Addresssanitizer topotests part 2: Incomplete (check logs for details)
Successful on other platforms/tests
  • Topo tests part 1 on Ubuntu 16.04 i386
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • Topo tests part 2 on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64
  • Topo tests part 2 on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64
  • IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • Topo tests part 2 on Ubuntu 16.04 i386
  • Topo tests part 1 on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
  • Debian 8 deb pkg check
  • Topo tests part 0 on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64
  • Topo tests part 1 on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64
  • Topo tests part 0 un Ubuntu 16.04 arm8
  • Topo tests part 0 on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64
  • IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Test incomplete. See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-13135/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Incomplete

Addresssanitizer topotests part 0: Incomplete (check logs for details)
Successful on other platforms/tests
  • Topo tests part 0 on Ubuntu 16.04 i386
  • Topo tests part 1 on Ubuntu 16.04 i386
  • Topo tests part 2 on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
  • Topo tests part 2 on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
  • Topo tests part 2 on Ubuntu 16.04 i386
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
  • Topo tests part 1 on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
  • IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • Debian 8 deb pkg check
  • Topo tests part 0 on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Topo tests part 0 un Ubuntu 16.04 arm8
  • Topo tests part 1 on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64
  • Topo tests part 0 on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04

@qlyoung qlyoung merged commit 939627b into master Jul 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants