Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create drasil-theory Package #918

Closed
5 tasks done
samm82 opened this issue Jul 19, 2018 · 14 comments · Fixed by #1340
Closed
5 tasks done

Create drasil-theory Package #918

samm82 opened this issue Jul 19, 2018 · 14 comments · Fixed by #1340
Assignees
Labels
design Related to the current design of Drasil (not artifacts). Low Priority

Comments

@samm82
Copy link
Collaborator

samm82 commented Jul 19, 2018

The drasil-theory subpackage should be created with the code for general requirements knowledge.

TODO

Each move should be its own PR

@samm82 samm82 added question Low Priority design Related to the current design of Drasil (not artifacts). labels Jul 19, 2018
@samm82 samm82 self-assigned this Jul 19, 2018
@Mornix

This comment has been minimized.

@szymczdm

This comment has been minimized.

@samm82

This comment has been minimized.

@Mornix

This comment has been minimized.

@JacquesCarette

This comment has been minimized.

@samm82

This comment has been minimized.

@JacquesCarette

This comment has been minimized.

@samm82 samm82 changed the title Move AssumpChunk to drasil-docLang Create drasil-theory Package May 6, 2019
@samm82

This comment has been minimized.

@JacquesCarette

This comment has been minimized.

@samm82

This comment has been minimized.

@Mornix

This comment has been minimized.

@JacquesCarette

This comment has been minimized.

@samm82

This comment has been minimized.

@JacquesCarette

This comment has been minimized.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
design Related to the current design of Drasil (not artifacts). Low Priority
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants