Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Double-bubble cryogenic tanks #64

Closed
wants to merge 18 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ngomezve
Copy link
Contributor

This PR removes inconsistencies in the geometry of the cryogenic tanks in the fuselage. Some models assumed that the geometry was a double bubble while others only applied to circular sections. Now, the tank cross-section can be a double bubble in general, following the fuselage section.

This PR also introduces a new function double_bubble_geom() that can be used to calculate the geometric properties of a double bubble shape. This function could also be used in fuseW for the fuselage design.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 13, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.87500% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 78.34%. Comparing base (78ba4b2) to head (1ec6ace).
Report is 32 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
src/cryo_tank/tankWmech.jl 94.11% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #64      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.41%   78.34%   +1.92%     
==========================================
  Files          69       72       +3     
  Lines       13169    13460     +291     
==========================================
+ Hits        10063    10545     +482     
+ Misses       3106     2915     -191     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ngomezve ngomezve marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2024 17:49
@ngomezve ngomezve mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2024
@ngomezve
Copy link
Contributor Author

ngomezve commented Sep 6, 2024

Closing as superseded by PR #80.

@ngomezve ngomezve closed this Sep 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants