Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Double bubble cryo tanks #80

Draft
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

ngomezve
Copy link
Contributor

@ngomezve ngomezve commented Sep 6, 2024

This PR is a revision of PR #64. It removes inconsistencies in the geometry of the cryogenic tanks in the fuselage. Some models assumed that the geometry was a double bubble while others only applied to circular sections. Now, the tank cross-section can be a double bubble in general, following the fuselage section.

This PR also introduces a function double_bubble_geom() that can be used to calculate the geometric properties of a double-bubble shape, including a scaled-down version.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 6, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.87500% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.39%. Comparing base (018c044) to head (96705ba).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/cryo_tank/tankWmech.jl 94.11% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #80      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.32%   73.39%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          77       78       +1     
  Lines       13846    13883      +37     
==========================================
+ Hits        10152    10190      +38     
+ Misses       3694     3693       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants