3 of 4 - refactor(router): sw-625 move to router v6

[cdcabrera]

What's included

• refactor(router): sw-625 move to router v6

Notes

• the routing move and related PRs
  • create a generated list of pre-sorted product configs on app load. this is prep for loading actual product configurations
  • eliminate the need to have a large independent routing configuration that defines every route. instead we now use a route parameter see :productPath. This parameter is "kind-of" superfluous due to the use of a noticeably quicker way of loading product configuration by handling window.location.pathname directly within the new routerContext.js hooks and routeHelpers.js
  • removes the use of react context in favor of simple hooks that
    • initialize the product config lookup with useSetRouteDetail and
    • provide product configuration based on a route parameter/config lookup, using product configuration details and/or their closest match based on pathname...
    • partial product names typed into the url will return a product now. The caveat is, it's what the GUI/algorithm determines to be the closest string match which doesn't always align to "human". This can be disabled if we determine it's causing problems
  • simplifies components, code... always good

How to test

Coverage and basic unit test check

1. update the NPM packages with $ yarn
2. $ yarn test
3. confirm tests come back clean

Check the build

1. update the NPM packages with $ yarn
2. $ yarn build
3. confirm tests come back clean

Example

...

Updates issue/story

swatch-625

related #1048 #1045

[cdcabrera]

As of 20221207 rebased and updated. Confirmed working both locally, and through the proxy against stage-beta.

We'll need to optimize how the route configs are being pulled since there looked like lag coming through the page loads, but that could also be associated with the proxy. The route configs don't change, once loaded, so caching them on an extended cache cycle might become a thing

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #989 (a053fcc) into dev (79fbda6) will decrease coverage by 0.14%.
The diff coverage is 92.23%.

❗ Current head a053fcc differs from pull request most recent head 37189ba. Consider uploading reports for the commit 37189ba to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #989      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.65%   93.52%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         121      123       +2     
  Lines        4052     4138      +86     
  Branches     1633     1679      +46     
==========================================
+ Hits         3795     3870      +75     
- Misses        240      251      +11     
  Partials       17       17              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...components/authentication/authenticationContext.js	100.00% <ø> (+3.03%)	⬆️
src/config/product.openshiftContainer.js	80.95% <ø> (ø)
src/config/product.openshiftDedicated.js	80.76% <ø> (ø)
src/config/product.openshiftMetrics.js	80.00% <ø> (ø)
src/config/product.rhacs.js	85.71% <ø> (ø)
src/config/product.rhel.js	90.69% <ø> (ø)
src/config/product.rhods.js	85.71% <ø> (ø)
src/config/product.rhosak.js	83.72% <ø> (ø)
src/config/product.satellite.js	94.11% <ø> (ø)
src/config/routes.js	100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 14 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 79fbda6...37189ba. Read the comment docs.

[cdcabrera]

/retest