-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: migrate x/evidence to mocks #12749
Conversation
) | ||
|
||
func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) TestHandleDoubleSign() { | ||
type InfractionTestSuite struct { | ||
suite.Suite |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not exactly sure, why use the mixing of mock test and integration test?
For example, why are you using simtestuitl instead of KeeperTestSuite?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because this seems to be more like an integration test, and logic is a bit critical to just mock, it felt more like I was testing mock expect than anything else. We discuss it a bit and for now we left it like that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this case, we don't use
cosmos-sdk/x/evidence/keeper/keeper_test.go
Line 145 in 035402d
func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) populateValidators(ctx sdk.Context) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
true sorry I missed that thanks!!!
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #12749 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 56.25% 56.15% -0.11%
==========================================
Files 645 641 -4
Lines 54656 54559 -97
==========================================
- Hits 30749 30638 -111
- Misses 21429 21453 +24
+ Partials 2478 2468 -10
|
Description
Closes: #12501
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking change